Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Political structure doomed Soviet Union

  • Print

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was the greatest tragedy of the 20th century.

Tragedy or not, the process of the Soviet collapse is meticulously chronicled by Serhii Plokhy, a professor of Ukrainian history at Harvard University, in a work that develops new interpretations and challenges some conventional thinking.

Plokhy believes that the fate of the Soviet Union was decided in the last five months of its existence, from late July to December 1991. His narrative focuses on these months, during which events occurred that changed world history.

Plokhy's story is driven by the interactions among four principal political figures: Mikhail Gorbachev, then-president of the Soviet Union; then-U.S. president George H.W. Bush; Boris Yeltsin, former leader of Russia, the largest of the republics that comprised the Soviet Union; and Leonid Kravchuk, then-leader of Ukraine, whose insistence on Ukrainian independence doomed the Soviet empire.

Plokhy evokes the drama of key events -- for example, the unsuccessful coup staged by hardliners in the KGB and military in August 1991, and the Ukrainian referendum on independence in early December of that year.

Plokhy has titled his account The Last Empire for good reason. According to the author, the disintegration of the Soviet Union was analogous to the dissolution of other European and Eurasian empires throughout the 20th century: the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, British, French and Portuguese.

The collapse of the Soviet Union, he argues, was a function of its "imperial foundations, multi-ethnic composition, and pseudofederal structure."

As he points out, the Soviet Union "died the death of an empire, splitting along lines roughly defined by ethnic and linguistic boundaries."

Plokhy's interpretation of the Soviet Union as the last of the classical European empires is cogent, but he could have developed it more thoroughly throughout the course of his narrative.

When Mikhail Gorbachev announced his resignation on Christmas Day 1991, and the red Soviet flag was lowered from the Kremlin for the last time, former president George H.W. Bush explained these events as a triumph for American values.

But Plokhy rejects this version of history.

In fact, he shows the American leadership worked to prolong the life of the Soviet Union and Gorbachev's ascendancy. Above all else, he says, Bush and his advisers were concerned with the security of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, and they viewed Gorbachev and his circle as known, likable and predictable.

Thus, in the interests of nuclear stability, they wanted Gorbachev to remain in power.

By portraying the Soviet collapse as an American triumph, Bush was taking credit for an outcome that he and his team had sought to forestall.

This was the irony of American post-Cold War triumphalism -- one of Plokhy's main themes.

Plokhy has written a challenging revisionist narrative that attributes the demise of the Soviet Union to its political structure, rather than to American policy.

 

Winnipeg writer Graeme Voyer dedicates this review to the memory of a wonderful cat named Figgy.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 17, 2014 G7

History

Updated on Saturday, May 17, 2014 at 8:52 AM CDT: Tweaks formatting.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Winnipeg Jets Bogosian-Little-Ladd

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Geese take cover in long grass in the Tuxedo Business Park near Route 90 Wednesday- Day 28– June 27, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • The sun peers through the fog to illuminate a tree covered in hoar frost near Headingley, Manitoba Thursday- Standup photo- February 02, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should the Canadian Museum for Human Rights use the word 'genocide' in exhibits on Indian residential schools?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google