Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
J.Lo back in crime-movie element, but Statham fails to humanize anti-hero
For a few moviegoers, it is enough that the poster for the movie Parker features a gun-toting Jason Statham front and centre. The Brit actor seems to churn out a new action movie every few months, and he can be relied upon to deliver a certain kind of roundhouse-kick energy to fans of the genre.
But there are better reasons to be excited about this latest adaptation of novelist Richard Stark's violent but fiercely principled anti-hero.
To summarize:
- A Parker adaptation happens rarely. Previous movies include Point Blank (1967), The Outfit (1973) and Payback (1999). In each of those cases, the hero's name was changed at the insistence of Stark (a pseudonym for mystery writer Donald E. Westlake, who died in 2008). This is the first Parker movie where the character is actually called Parker.
- Director Taylor Hackford (Ray, The Devil's Advocate, An Officer and a Gentleman) isn't some action-movie hack, so there was some chance he would treat the material with more respect than that afforded to a typical Jason Statham cinematic knuckle-duster.
- Jennifer Lopez was at her best in the crime-movie milieu -- think: Out of Sight -- and her appearance in Parker offers the promise of a sexy, formidable Lopez, as opposed to the cloying cutie-pie she has presented in rom-coms.
Maddeningly, the Parker movie we deserve remains out of reach. The script by John J. McLaughlin (Black Swan) starts promisingly, with an armed robbery at a county fair. Statham's Parker, dressed in a grey wig and a minister's collar, establishes his moral authority while holding a gun on panicky fair employees: "I don't steal from people who can't afford it, and I don't hurt people that don't deserve it."
Notably, two of his confederates (Michael Chiklis and Clifton Collins Jr.) are dressed as clowns. No moral authority there.
The heist succeeds, but Parker's partners turn on him and after a fierce fight in the getaway car, they leave him for dead in a ditch. Instead of simply avenging himself on his partners, he manfully recovers from his wounds and follows the gang to the lush environs of filthy-rich Palm Beach. Enlisting the aid of the desperately impoverished real estate agent Leslie (Jennifer Lopez), Parker disguises himself as a rich oilman and starts casing Palm Beach to determine the gang's next heist.
Hackford strives to give Parker a little respectability. A two-hour running time indicates Hackford's unwillingness to spew out another thrill-a-minute Jason Statham movie, delivering instead a more meticulous revenge thriller. When the thrills do come, Hackford is not squeamish about wince-inducing brutality, especially in a hotel room fight scene between Parker and a particularly vicious hit man.
But the movie mostly botches the source material. This is largely due to casting Statham, an actor who makes so many action movies, his characters have become almost indistinguishable. Director John Boorman's modernist Point Blank is probably closest to the definitive Parker movie on the strength of Lee Marvin's portrayal of the anti-hero as a remorseless killing machine. Marvin, a decorated veteran of the Battle of Saipan, was comfortable portraying a brute.
Statham can't seem to help himself from making Parker a nice guy. And Parker is not a nice guy.
Needless to say, that renders the relationship between Parker and Leslie as a kind of will-they-or-won't-they dynamic more appropriate to a sitcom and not a savage revenge movie.
So, no, this is not the movie that heralds the return of the tough-but-smouldering Jennifer Lopez we briefly loved.
Sorry about that, Parker. Here's hoping you survive to appear in the cineplex in another 15 years.
Other voices
Selected excerpts of reviews of Parker:
"Tonally, Parker's not so much broad or inclusive as weirdly schizophrenic, vacillating between flat comedy and spiked savagery, the product of a painfully slapdash script."
-- John Semley, Slant
"Even the people who griped about Tom Cruise being cast as the towering Jack Reacher will have to admit Statham fits nicely in Parker's shoes."
-- Connie Ogle, Miami Herald
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 25, 2013 D1
History
Updated on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 10:29 AM CST: replaces photo, adds fact box
More Movies
- Back to Top
- Return to Movies
More Movies
(1 of 27 articles for this week)
'Trek' does $70.6M but falls short of studio hopes; 'Iron Man 3' tops $1B worldwide
05/19/2013 9:46 PM 0About Randall King
In a way, Randall King was born into the entertainment beat.
His dad was Winnipeg musician Jimmy King, a one-time columnist for the Winnipeg Free Press. One of his brothers is a playwright. Another is a singer-songwriter.
Randall has been content to cover the entertainment beat in one capacity or another since 1990.
His beat is film, and the job has placed him in the same room as diverse talents, from Martin Scorsese to Martin Short, from Julie Christie to Julia Styles. He has met three James Bonds (four if you count Woody Allen), and director Russ Meyer once told him: "I like your style."
He really likes his job.
Poll
Most Popular Movies
- 'Trek' does $70.6M but falls short of studio hopes; 'Iron Man 3' tops $1B worldwide
- Second instalment of sci-fi reboot lacks Khan-do attitude
- McConaughey excels in tale of Southern masculinity
- MOVIES
- Difficult bandmate, terrible husband, amazing drummer
- The point? What point?
- Comedy covers sex from A to Z... by way of S&M
- Pop Forecast's got problems
- Thriller better at politics than mathematics
- Documentary 'Doin' it in the Park' is a loving ode to New York playground basketball
- Medical community lauds Jolie's courage, while pointing out that her solution is not for all
- McConaughey excels in tale of Southern masculinity
- Second instalment of sci-fi reboot lacks Khan-do attitude
- Free Press chats with producer Klymkiw before doc screens
- Difficult bandmate, terrible husband, amazing drummer
- 'Trek' does $70.6M but falls short of studio hopes; 'Iron Man 3' tops $1B worldwide
- Matthew McConaughey says 'Mud' avoids stereotypical view of U.S. South
- Comedy covers sex from A to Z... by way of S&M
- Doc pays tribute to producer who put local films on the map
- Subtle horror unwinds in psychological film
- Medical community lauds Jolie's courage, while pointing out that her solution is not for all
- There's some big, dumb fun to be had in comedy caper, but the laughs come at a queasy cost
- McConaughey excels in tale of Southern masculinity
- Second instalment of sci-fi reboot lacks Khan-do attitude
- Comedy covers sex from A to Z... by way of S&M
- Futuristic Colony bleak inside and out
- Director takes ‘Roaring ’20s’ literally with loud, garish Gatsby adaptation
- Tony Stark doesn't suit up as often, but sequel still packs in action
- Catherine Zeta-Jones checks into mental health facility for treatment of bipolar disorder
- Reese Witherspoon says she's 'deeply embarrassed' by arrest; Atlanta hearing rescheduled
- Medical community lauds Jolie's courage, while pointing out that her solution is not for all
- Second instalment of sci-fi reboot lacks Khan-do attitude
- Free Press chats with producer Klymkiw before doc screens
- Difficult bandmate, terrible husband, amazing drummer
- Medical community lauds Jolie's courage, while pointing out that her solution is not for all
- Second instalment of sci-fi reboot lacks Khan-do attitude
- Movie looking for boy with 'open, honest face'
- Open casting call for part of young boy in Winnipeg-shot film
- Six Israeli secret service chiefs and one inescapable conclusion
- Tony Stark doesn't suit up as often, but sequel still packs in action
- Jonas Chernick, star of My Awkward Sexual Adventure at News Café
- Imax to go out way it came in
- Manga: it's not just for kids anymore
- Cut out the jargon: Alan Alda centre at NY college teaches scientists to keep it simple
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.