Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Which Wolf is it?

Scorsese splits viewers with his sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll portrayal of financial fraud

  • Print

Of all the Oscar frontrunners, Martin Scorsese's The Wolf of Wall Street is the most polarizing.

Is it, as one rapt critic writes, "a delirious, manic, push-the-limits comedy of gaudy amorality?" Or possibly, "as hot and wet as freshly butchered meat: every second, every frame of its three-hour running time virile with a lifetime's accumulated genius?"

Or, as its detractors suggest, could the film be "pushy and hollow, too much of a bad thing?" How about "bloated, redundant, vulgar, shapeless and pointless?"

Scripted by Terence Winter (The Sopranos) and starring an Oscar-nominated Leonardo DiCaprio, Wolf centres on Jordan Belfort, the real-life financial flim-flam man who perfected a "pump and dump" scheme in the late 1980s and defrauded small-time penny-stock investors of more than $200 million. Belfort once made $12 mill in less than five minutes, and he spent money at almost the same rate. (In the movie, he throws cash around, sometimes literally.)

Analyzing Scorsese's shamelessly glamorous greed-fest, most of the Internet yelling comes down to one question: Does Wolf expose its central subject? Or does it endorse him?

That's a tricky question, and one that will be thrashed out until Oscar night and beyond. In the meantime, it's instructive to put Scorsese's exuberant, extravagant cinematic energy to one side for a moment, and take a look at a YouTube video of the real-life 1994 Christmas party at Belfort's firm.

Through the medium of crappy '90s video, we see Belfort giving a speech about pride, integrity, loyalty, blah, blah, blah, while people mill around and look bored. There's a background hum of talking, shuffling and aimless drunken shout-outs. Twice Belfort shushes people. At another point he says, "helloooo" into the microphone, because his audience is drifting away.

As one YouTube viewer comments: "Big letdown after watching the movie."

Well, yes. The footage is sort of excruciating, and it's not even three minutes long. Basically, it feels like your own office Christmas party. And would you pay $10.25 to see that?

The movie, on the other hand, is three hours long, and packed with orgiastic office parties and beach-house bacchanals, hookers and blow, kinky sex and Quaalude-fuelled car accidents. DiCaprio charges through doors and rallies his adoring employees with ecstatic exhortations.

It's an incredible physical expression of American excess, brought to life with plunging, prowling camerawork, hyperkinetic motion and jazzy rhythmic editing. Scorsese turns Belfort's office into a beautifully choreographed carnival of chimps, semi-nude marching bands and prostitute parades, with the money fluttering in the air like confetti.

Then there's Belfort himself. Leo brings always brings some of his golden-boy aura with him, even when he's not playing a golden boy. Here his movie-star presence gilds Belfort, who in real life tends to come off as a Vegas-era Paul Anka, with maybe a touch of Sitch from Jersey Shore.

It's not surprising that Scorsese's bravura treatment of such a morally worthless subject has everyone riled up. This rise-and-fall story (actually more of a rise-and-rise-and-rise-and-very-slight-fall story) provokes strong reactions. Some viewers respond with a queasy mix of envy and contempt, others with thundering condemnation, still others -- especially in the theatres in New York's financial district -- with wild cheering.

People see what they want to see in Wolf. It's interesting that Oliver Stone's Wall Street, a ponderous morality tale that's the opposite of Scorsese's brazen dark comedy, was also read by some as condemnation, by others as celebration.

As the argument rages, combatants talk about the fraught relationship between art and life, attempting to sort out fact and fiction in Belfort's self-serving story.

Facts do pop up in unlikely places in Wolf. Belfort's partner Danny Porush, who is called Donnie Azoff in the film, really did marry his first cousin. And the real Jordan Belfort did have sex on a bed covered in money -- a cool $3 million, evidently. In our postmodern world, it seems, people who can afford to live out insanely excessive movie clichés are doing just that.

But the film as a whole, all glamour and gleam and id-like energy, is clearly a fiction. As that "letdown" YouTube footage suggests, Belfort in life could never be what Scorsese made him with his more-more-more art.

The film's haters will say that Scorsese has given Belfort the kind of myth he's always wanted. The film's fans will say that, ultimately, Wolf is not about Jordan Belfort at all: he's just a stand-in for something much bigger.

Meanwhile, recent news that the DVD will feature a four-hour version -- with bonus sex and f-bombs and financial malfeasance! -- means this fight is far from over.

alison.gillmor@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 1, 2014 D14

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Jets This Week: Quarter Season Analysis

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A mother goose has chosen a rather busy spot to nest her eggs- in the parking lot of St Vital Centre on a boulevard. Countless cars buzz by and people have begun to bring it food.-Goose Challenge Day 06 - May 08, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • Two baby tigers were unveiled at the Assiniboine Park Zoo this morning, October 3rd, 2011. (TREVOR HAGAN/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Are you concerned about the death of a seal at the Assiniboine Park Zoo?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google