Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

New studies question long-held idea that we should drastically reduce sodium intake

  • Print
A large international study challenges the advice for most people to cut back on salt. Unless they have high blood pressure, the amount most folks consume is OK for heart health, and too little may be as bad as too much, the study suggests.

CLIFF OWEN / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES Enlarge Image

A large international study challenges the advice for most people to cut back on salt. Unless they have high blood pressure, the amount most folks consume is OK for heart health, and too little may be as bad as too much, the study suggests.

TORONTO -- A pair of large international studies are questioning the validity of the notion that the less salt a person consumes, the better. In fact, the Canadian-led research suggests too little salt in the diet may even be a bad thing.

The studies, published recently in the New England Journal of Medicine, involved more than 100,000 people in 18 countries and assessed daily sodium and potassium intake, relating them to blood pressure levels and to the risk of heart disease, strokes and deaths.

On average, Canadians ingest between 3.5 and four grams of sodium per day, but some guidelines have recommended lowering daily intake to less than 2.3 grams per day, a level the researchers say has been attained by less than five per cent of the population, both in Canada and around the world.

In 2010, a 25-member sodium working group chaired by Health Canada advised Canadian adults to try to cut salt consumption by a third so they could reach a maximum of 2.3 grams a day by 2016. The group said 1.5 grams daily is considered adequate intake.

Hypertension Canada, an organization of about 70 health professionals from across the country, had recommended that teens and adults limit sodium intake to between 1.2 and 1.5 grams, depending on age. But last October, it raised that amount to two grams, the equivalent of roughly five millilitres (one teaspoon) of salt, after reviewing the latest research on the effects of dietary sodium on blood pressure.

The Prospective Urban Rural (PURE) study, led by investigators at McMaster University, shows that a dietary sodium level exceeding five grams per day does indeed raise blood pressure, especially among people who already have hypertension and those age 55 and older. High blood pressure, or hypertension, is a known risk factor for heart attack, heart failure, stroke and other disorders.

But cardiologist Dr. Salim Yusuf, principal researcher of the two studies, said the effects of blood pressure are more modest at average levels of sodium consumption -- three to five grams per day -- and not obvious at amounts below three grams, which is under the maximum intake recommended by many guidelines.

"It makes sense if your blood pressure is high, your sodium intake is high, to lower sodium," Yusuf said Wednesday from Hamilton. "But what is often ignored is that increasing your potassium intake by eating healthy foods is also beneficial and just as important, and the two together is your best strategy."

Bananas, avocados, sweet potatoes, green leafy vegetables and legumes are just some of the foods rich in potassium.

"A balanced approach is what is likely to have the greatest benefit in lowering blood pressure," said Andrew Mente, an assistant professor of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, and lead author of the first paper. "This can be achieved by moderation in salt intake, combined with eating lots of fruits and vegetables."

While ingesting too much sodium, either by dosing meals from a salt shaker or eating an abundance of processed foods, can pose serious health risks, the researchers' companion study suggests that getting too little salt also may be dangerous.

"The second paper shows that increased sodium intake, over six grams a day or even five grams a day, is certainly associated with an increased risk of heart disease, strokes and death," said Yusuf. "And so once somebody's intake is above that, it makes sense to lower it."

But the population-based study found that with ingested daily sodium levels between three and five to six grams, there was a lower risk of cardiovascular events and death, as compared with either a higher or lower level of salt in the diet.

In people whose average daily sodium intake is less than three grams -- so below the amount recommended by many guidelines -- the study found an elevated risk of heart attack, stroke and other serious cardiovascular problems, he said.

"So it makes no sense, then, to try to lower that."

Lead author Martin O'Donnell, an associate clinical professor at McMaster and National University of Ireland in Galway, said low sodium levels in the body can boost certain hormones that are related to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and death.

"The key question is whether these competing physiologic effects result in net clinical benefit or not," said O'Donnell. "In the PURE study, we found the lowest risk of death and cardiovascular events in those who consumed moderate amounts of sodium intake (three to six grams per day), with an increased risk above and below that range.

"While this finding has been reported in previous smaller studies, PURE is the largest international study to study sodium intake and health outcomes, and adds considerable strength to the contention that moderate sodium intake is optimal."

Yusuf said the studies' findings question the much-touted notion that salt is unhealthy and that consumers and the food industry should severely cut sodium content in food.

But he said that contention -- and the guidelines it spawned -- are based on a paucity of scientific evidence.

"They were done with a modest degree of evidence that sodium reduction lowers blood pressure, and then people just extrapolated all the way down to levels at which we had very little data ... The guidelines were done with practically no evidence that sodium reduction reduces cardiovascular disease."

The gold standard for such scientific evidence is a clinical trial, in which participants are randomly assigned to receive different interventions. In a medication trial, for instance, half the subjects would be given the experimental drug being studied, while the other half would get a dummy pill. The effects would then be compared.

That's an approach endorsed by Prof. Suzanne Oparil, director of the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program at the University of Birmingham, Ala. In an accompanying editorial, she says randomized trials are needed to compare outcomes in people with typical daily salt consumption versus very low salt intake to determine if reducing sodium leads to fewer heart attacks, strokes and deaths.

"These provocative findings beg for a randomized, controlled outcome trial to compare reduced sodium intake with usual diet," Oparil writes of the PURE studies. "In the absence of such a trial, the results argue against reduction of dietary sodium as an isolated public health recommendation."

 

-- The Associated Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 18, 2014 D1

History

Updated on Monday, August 18, 2014 at 6:41 AM CDT: Changes headline, changes photo

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Fire destroys one St. Norbert home, damages another

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A Yellow-bellied Sapsucker hangs out on a birch tree in St. Vital. The Yellow-bellied Sapsucker is considered a keystone species. Other species take advantage of the holes that the birds make in trees. A group of sapsuckers are collectively known as a
  • A gosling stares near water at Omands Creek Park-See Bryksa 30 day goose challenge- Day 25– June 21, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should Canada send heavy military equipment to Ukraine?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google