Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
A case for civil disobedience
Editor’s note: Columnist Roslyn Kunin recently wrote about the dangers of civil disobedience to civil society. She pointed out that the Sierra Club Canada was discussing taking up civil disobedience. John Bennett, executive director of the Sierra Club Canada, was asked to respond.
OTTAWA — All the benefits Roslyn Kunin attributes to life in Canada in her recent column, including peace and order and good government, came about through civil disobedience. The suffragettes who won women the right vote did not shy away from it.
Civil disobedience is breaking an unjust law or breaking a law to draw attention to an unjust law. It has played a major role in creating democracy around the world. We shouldn’t forget that ever.
Nor will I shy away from discussing it, but to be clear I have not said Sierra Club Canada members will be taking up civil disobedience. We are discussing it for good reason.
Last year, the energy industry sent the government a list of changes to federal environmental laws including: the Environmental Assessment Act, the Fisheries Act, the Navigable Waters Act and the Species at Risk Act.
Without disclosing this letter, the federal government stuffed the changes into two omnibus budget bills and rammed them through Parliament despite the objections of tens of thousands of Canadians and more than 650 environmental, faith, health and business organizations that spoke out against them.
In the few short months since, an estimated 4,000 environmental assessments have been dropped. There are now rules preventing members of the public from participating in environmental assessments and the same cabinet ministers who promote projects and describe opponents as "radicals" and "money launderers" now have the final say on all projects.
There no longer is an arm’s-length process to determine the acceptability environmentally or otherwise of industrial projects. Thirty years of developing environmental policies to protect our air, forests and wildlife have been swept away.
These changes have deprived Canadians of their rights to participate in the decision that will impact them and their children. By any definition these are unjust laws that demand challenging.
Personally, I am no stranger to the concept of direct action and non-violent civil disobedience, but it has been 30 years since I deliberately broke a law to draw attention to an important issue. I have grown to believe it’s used far too often. So for many years, I, like Sierra Club Canada, have followed a legal course of what I call "technical" campaigning.
We research issues and solutions to ensure our policies and solutions are based on sound science and are sustainable and economically desirable. Then using the media and person-to-person contact, we first try to impact public opinion, and then to persuade government and industry to act. It is an effective technique (coal plants in Ontario are being shut down because of it and Agent Orange and a broad range of toxic substances are banned because of it).
For it to work, however, government must be prepared to act on scientific basis. Every successful campaign has relied on scientific evidence and when it was present government acted. However, when it comes to climate change, the government Canada is ignoring the science, and, worse, laying off scientists and silencing those who have kept their jobs. For 20 years I have been campaigning for action on climate change. We have experienced the 10 hottest years in history in that time. Storms have grown stronger and more frequent. Glaciers and Arctic sea ice have melted and still no action.
There is an ideology ruling this country seeking to profit from our natural resources without taking responsibility for climatic catastrophe that awaits our children. When it is opposed using the law, it changes the law. When it is presented with evidence, it turns a blind eye and approves the next oil project.
This has caused many people, including members of Sierra Club Canada, to question the efficacy of technical campaigning.
Repeatedly throughout the 20th century, people were forced to stand up to ideologues — often at great peril to themselves. People like Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. stood up to duly elected governments and demanded action using civil disobedience — it’s not a novel, or radical, idea. Nelson Mandela spent 28 years in prison for opposing government policy. These are the people who come to mind when the discussion turns to civil disobedience.
Droughts, floods, storms are not just reports on television. They kill people and make the survivors homeless. It is only going to get worse if we don’t act significantly and immediately. Can people be expected to stand by and allow this injustice to continue?
—Troy Media
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More The Green Page
- Back to Top
- Return to The Green Page
More The Green Page
(1 of 6 articles for today)
Gallows humour, bottled water gets Montrealers through the day in city under advisory
4:47 PM 0MONTREAL - A huge boil-water advisory, affecting 1.3 million people in Montreal, will be maintained at least until late this ...
Poll
Most Popular The Green Page
- Gallows humour, bottled water gets Montrealers through the day in city under advisory
- Wildfire west of Edmonton forces 200 people from homes, another 200 on alert
- Heavy rain causes extensive overland flooding of farmland in Manitoba
- Coast guard will lower subsea bags to seal leaking shipwreck off Newfoundland
- Sunk? No reports of drifting ghost ship Lyubov Orlova in more than two months
- Inuit-Metis group withdraws from Muskrat Falls environmental review
- Senate expense scandal makes for awkward South America visit by Harper
- Cleanup of the Buchans mine in Newfoundland moving into its final phase
- Warm weather with cool breaks forecast for Canada this summer
- Spray ban may be coming
- Warm weather with cool breaks forecast for Canada this summer
- Boreal Forest conservation negotiations end in failure after three years
- Technology will be key to conquering climate change in long run, Harper says
- White beefalo has new home to roam at Saskatoon's Forestry Farm exhibit
- Wildfire west of Edmonton forces 200 people from homes, another 200 on alert
- Gallows humour, bottled water gets Montrealers through the day in city under advisory
- More than 91,000 litres of oil spilled from derailed Saskatchewan train
- After days on pins and needles, hypothermic turtles are recovering
- Spray ban may be coming
- Inuit-Metis group withdraws from Muskrat Falls environmental review
- Warm weather with cool breaks forecast for Canada this summer
- Emergency management officials waiting for water levels to rise in Regina
- Flooding prompts three Saskatchewan communities to declare states of emergency
- Navy warship fuel spill into Halifax harbour described as "significant"
- Technology will be key to conquering climate change in long run, Harper says
- Harper heads to New York to face grilling on Canada's environmental record
- Boreal Forest conservation negotiations end in failure after three years
- Purchasing power: Five ways consumers can be more socially conscious in shopping
- Former Liberal prime minister intends to let Americans know the benefits of Keystone
- Source of sporadic oil slicks off northeastern Newfoundland remains a mystery
- Warm weather with cool breaks forecast for Canada this summer
- 10th Saskatchewan community declares flood emergency; Regina residents told to prepare
- Better oil price needed for emissions controls to work: environment minister
- Harper heads to New York to face grilling on Canada's environmental record
- More money may be needed for heritage area along Manitoba-Ontario boundary
- Sandbags filled, barriers ready as Saskatchewan communities prepare for flooding
- Purchasing power: Five ways consumers can be more socially conscious in shopping
- Ship that sank in 1985 likely source of small oil slicks off Newfoundland
- Liberal Justin Trudeau praises Alberta premier for Keystone efforts, pans Harper
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.