The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Only Ontario can permit logging on aboriginal lands, Supreme Court rules

  • Print
Then Ontario Aboriginal Affairs Minister Kathleen Wynne speaks with members of the Grassy Narrows band during a protest on the lawn of the Ontario Legislature in Toronto on June 6, 2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Frank Gunn

Enlarge Image

Then Ontario Aboriginal Affairs Minister Kathleen Wynne speaks with members of the Grassy Narrows band during a protest on the lawn of the Ontario Legislature in Toronto on June 6, 2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Frank Gunn

OTTAWA - A recent courtroom winning streak for Canada's aboriginal communities came to a sudden stop Friday as the Supreme Court upheld the Ontario government's power to permit industrial logging on a First Nation's traditional lands.

The Ontario government does not need Ottawa's permission to allow forestry and mining activity under an 1873 treaty that ceded large swaths of Ontario and Manitoba to the federal government, the high court said in a unanimous 7-0 ruling.

"I agree with the Ontario Court of Appeal that Ontario, and only Ontario, has the power to take up lands under Treaty 3," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the decision.

The ruling, a blow to northern Ontario's Grassy Narrows First Nation, follows a historic Supreme Court judgment in British Columbia that changed the way governments must deal with First Nations over land where aboriginal title is claimed.

Grassy Narrows is different from the Tsilhqot'in decision because it involves treaty land, not aboriginal title. But experts say the two decisions, taken together, help clarify what's necessary for natural resource projects to proceed on aboriginal land.

"If you don't have the support of the aboriginal group, then the Crown is going to have a slightly different standard to meet in each case, depending on where the project is," said lawyer Keith Bergner of Vancouver firm Lawson Lundell LLP.

"If it's on aboriginal title land, it's going to be a very high standard. If it's on land where title has been asserted but not yet proven, it's going to be a consultation and accommodation standard.

"If it's on land that has been surrendered pursuant to a historic treaty, there's again a consultation and accommodation requirement, albeit arguably on a lower standard."

Dominique Nouvet, who specializes in aboriginal law at the Victoria firm Woodward & Company, said in both the Grassy Narrows and Tsilhqot'in decisions, the Supreme Court rejected arguments that would have subjected provincial government decision-making to federal supervision.

But she called it shocking that the federal government that signed the numbered treaties with aboriginals is not considered responsible for honouring those promises.

"That's the message this decision sends: if the provinces own the land, it's their job to manage the treaty rights," Nouvet said.

"And the provinces are not currently doing that, especially Alberta."

Indeed, provinces have been trampling aboriginal treaty rights, she said.

"The provinces have been seriously encroaching on treaty harvesting rights of many First Nations, to the point of extinguishment or near-extinguishment. There are many traditional aboriginal cultures, especially in Alberta, that are on the brink of survival."

Grassy Narrows appealed after Ontario's highest court ruled in March 2013 that the province has the right to take up treaty land for forestry and mining.

Only Ottawa has the power to take up the land, argued the First Nation, because treaty promises were made with the federal Crown.

The Supreme Court rejected that argument.

Grassy Narrows Chief Roger Fobister said the fight to protect the First Nation's people and land will continue.

"While we hoped the Supreme Court of Canada would respect our treaty, we are determined to see Treaty 3 respected," he said in a statement.

"We expect the government of Ontario and Canada to learn from the last ten years and come to the table ready to deal with the real needs of our people which requires ensuring a sustainable future both environmentally and economically."

Bill Mauro, Ontario's minister of natural resources and forestry, said the decision provides a welcome and long-overdue degree of clarity.

"We are hopeful that this decision will provide an opportunity for all parties to focus on the best approaches moving forward," Mauro said in a statement.

"Ontario respects aboriginal and treaty rights and remains committed to developing positive relationships with First Nations, including Grassy Narrows and others in the Treaty 3 area."

Grassy Narrows is a tiny community from northwestern Ontario that has spent more than a decade in court fighting the province's decision to issue a licence for clearcut operations in parts of the Keewatin portion of Treaty 3 territory.

The First Nation says scientific studies indicate that clearcut logging in boreal watersheds raises mercury levels in fish above the Health Canada limit for safe human consumption.

It says recent clearcut logging in Grassy Narrows territory has exacerbated the impact of mercury poisoning that began when a paper mill upstream in Dryden, Ont., dumped mercury between 1962 and 1970.

— With files from Maria Babbage in Toronto

Follow @steve_rennie on Twitter

History

Updated on Friday, July 11, 2014 at 6:14 PM CDT: Fixes typo in headline.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Willy wants to get back to winning

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Hay bales sit under a rainbow just west of Winnipeg Saturday, September 3, 2011.(John Woods/Winnipeg Free Press)
  • A baby Red Panda in her area at the Zoo. International Red Panda Day is Saturday September 15th and the Assiniboine Park Zoo will be celebrating in a big way! The Zoo is home to three red pandas - Rufus, Rouge and their cub who was born on June 30 of this year. The female cub has yet to be named and the Assiniboine Park Zoo is asking the community to help. September 14, 2012  BORIS MINKEVICH / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you think e-cigarettes should be banned by the school division?

View Results

Ads by Google