The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

EPA hears from California residents at hearing on plan that would cut refinery air pollution

  • Print

LOS ANGELES, Calif. - Residents of modest neighbourhoods near three of the largest oil refineries in California called on the Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday to crack down on plant emissions, saying the pollution is choking their children and endangering their health.

Residents of the oil-rich Wilmington area of Los Angeles were among 15 speakers to address the morning session of an EPA hearing about a proposed rule requiring stricter emission controls and monitoring standards.

Several speakers said they have suffered from asthma and other ailments they believe were caused by the refineries near the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

"My own family suffers from asthma," said Evelyn Knight, who has lived in neighbouring Long Beach since 1968. "I had a brother die from lung cancer who never smoked. Many friends have come down with cancer."

Community organizer Shabaka Heru said children whose lungs and other organs are still developing are particularly at risk.

"We have children who have inflated incidents of asthma," he said.

The EPA proposal would require the petroleum industry adopt new technology to better monitor emissions of the carcinogen benzene, upgrade storage tank emission controls and ensure waste gases are properly destroyed.

Refineries would also have to improve perimeter monitoring to get a clearer picture of how much toxic pollution is drifting into communities. Those findings would have to be made available to the public.

EPA officials estimate such actions could reduce toxic air emissions from refineries by as much as 5,600 tons a year.

Three executives with the petroleum industry told the three-member hearing panel that the proposed changes could cost the industry as much as a billion dollars and provide little in the way of improved air quality.

"Air quality in the United States has improved significantly, continues to improve, and our industry is doing its part to contribute to the success," said Howard Feldman, director of regulatory and scientific affairs for the American Petroleum Institute.

"It goes without saying that the safe operation of our refineries to protect our workers and the community is our No. 1 priority," he added.

Members of the community disagreed.

"There will never be a solution until the perpetrators of the pollution in our community take full responsibility and have zero pollution," Knight said.

Flavio Mercado of Wilmington brought a jar of black gunk he said was particulate matter from a refinery that had been collected from a neighbourhood. Photos of refineries belching plumes of huge, black smoke as neighbourhood children play in the foreground were displayed.

United Steelworkers member David Campbell said his union also supports the tougher standards.

"Our union sees this as a benefit to not only our members who work inside the facilities but also to our friends and families who work and live outside the fence line," he said.

The hearing, attended by about 40 people, adjourned shortly before noon and was to resume Wednesday evening, when 15 more people were scheduled to speak.

Another hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5 in Texas, and the EPA has set aside a 60-day period for people to submit written comments. No action is expected before next year.

The Wilmington area has more than 6,000 oil wells and is home to three of California's major oil refineries. The 9-square-mile area with 53,000 residents also includes the third-largest oil field in the contiguous United States.

The proposed rules changes came from the resolution of a lawsuit brought in 2012 by the environmental groups Earthjustice and Environmental Integrity Project on behalf of people directly affected by emissions from refineries in Louisiana, Texas and California.

The action accused the EPA of shirking its responsibility under the Clean Air Act by neglecting to review and possibly revise refinery emission standards every three years. The EPA has not implemented new emission standards since 1995.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Bowman pledges to find efficiencies at City Hall

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • The sun peers through the fog to illuminate a tree covered in hoar frost near Headingley, Manitoba Thursday- Standup photo- February 02, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • May 22, 2012 - 120522  - Westminster United Church photographed Tuesday May 22, 2012 .  John Woods / Winnipeg Free Press

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you think e-cigarettes should be banned by the school division?

View Results

Ads by Google