17°c Partly cloudy
12°c Cloudy with showers
The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION
Ethics panel: More work needed before government considers testing anthrax vaccine in children
WASHINGTON - Don't look for testing of the anthrax vaccine to begin in children any time soon.
Controversy arose last year as experts debated whether such studies should be done to learn how to treat children in case of a bioterror attack.
But a presidential commission says the government would have to take multiple steps — including more safety research in young adults — before it would be ethical to consider tests in children.
"The safety of our children is paramount, and we have to get this precisely right," said Dr. Amy Gutmann, who chairs the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, which released its report Tuesday.
More than a decade after the anthrax attacks, the government has a multibillion-dollar stockpile of drugs and vaccines to fight an array of threats. There's no information on whether those so-called countermeasures would work in children like they're expected to help their parents, or even what dose to use. Yet if a large attack were to occur, children undoubtedly would receive those untested products.
Worried about how to handle an emergency, a government advisory group recommended studying the anthrax vaccine in children if independent ethics experts agreed it could be done appropriately. The Obama administration put that question to the panel.
Tuesday's answer: Children don't gain any benefit from pre-attack research with the anthrax vaccine or other countermeasures. So the panel said such studies would be ethical only if they presented no more than minimal risk to participants — like the risk from a routine medical check-up. Determining that would require, among other things, more testing in adults, the panel added. Something that proved safe in 18-year-olds, for example, might be a candidate to study next in 16- and 17-year-olds.
However, the government should plan now for how it would study children who receive those treatments in the event of an attack, the panel said.
The Health and Human Services Department, which requested the advice, said it would review the findings.
More Your Health
- Back to Top
- Return to Your Health
More Your Health
(1 of 20 articles for today)
Common Supplement May Help Patients Fight Heart Failure
7:00 PM 0
Poll
Most Popular Your Health
- Smoke sales forbidden at pharmacies, health facilities starting May 31
- CT-scans: weigh negative and positive effects
- Toxic drug that was abandoned in development offered for sale online to athletes
- Baker's cyst A sign of something else
- Canada lifts lifetime ban on gay men giving blood, but some restrictions remain
- Voluntary recall of children's medicine: Health Canada
- Vitamin C and lysine proven to keep arteries healthy
- Adrenal fatigue can have significant impact
- Vet to deliver birth control for stray dogs in Labrador Innu communities
- H7N9 virus closer to being human transmissible than other bird flu viruses
- Smoke sales forbidden at pharmacies, health facilities starting May 31
- Canada lifts lifetime ban on gay men giving blood, but some restrictions remain
- Skin picking gets status as distinct disorder, should help sufferers access help
- Over one million affected by boil-water advisory in Montreal
- New Brunswick discouraging new family doctors from practising: medical residents
- Measles outbreaks flourish in UK years after discredited research tied measles shot to autism
- Baker's cyst A sign of something else
- Three companies recall antipsychotic drug quetiapine: Health Canada says
- Vitamin C and lysine proven to keep arteries healthy
- CT-scans: weigh negative and positive effects
- Baby delivery: safe haven baby drop-off sites open in Edmonton hospitals
- Boston Marathon bombing victims face huge medical bills; tens of millions in donations pour in
- Angelina Jolie's double mastectomy: Q&A
- Smoke sales forbidden at pharmacies, health facilities starting May 31
- Pharmacy assistant who found diluted cancer drugs says label raised questions
- Vitamin C and lysine proven to keep arteries healthy
- Auditor general takes aim at residential schools, diabetes prevention
- Baker's cyst A sign of something else
- Hockey commentator Kelly Hrudey shares daughter's struggle with mental illness
- Biomedical engineer designs exercises, tests to battle Alzheimer's
- Canada lifts lifetime ban on gay men giving blood, but some restrictions remain
- Vitamin C and lysine proven to keep arteries healthy
- Skin picking gets status as distinct disorder, should help sufferers access help
- CT-scans: weigh negative and positive effects
- Adrenal fatigue can have significant impact
- Canadian dies with aid of doctor in Zurich; wished it could have been in Canada
- Avoid herpes -- make love like a porcupine
- Three companies recall antipsychotic drug quetiapine: Health Canada says
- Measles outbreaks flourish in UK years after discredited research tied measles shot to autism
- Avoid allergen triggers to keep guests safe when barbecuing this summer
- Vitamin C and lysine proven to keep arteries healthy
- Biomedical engineer designs exercises, tests to battle Alzheimer's
- Adrenal fatigue can have significant impact
- Kidney problems price we pay for progress
- Natural medicine best for lowering cholesterol
- Canada lifts lifetime ban on gay men giving blood, but some restrictions remain
- Hockey commentator Kelly Hrudey shares daughter's struggle with mental illness
- Skin picking gets status as distinct disorder, should help sufferers access help
- Knee repair? Study finds physical therapy as good as surgery for torn cartilage, arthritis
- Canadian dies with aid of doctor in Zurich; wished it could have been in Canada
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.