Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Pelvic examinations of utmost importance
A recent headline in one of Canada's national newspapers screamed Time To End Pelvic Examinations Done Without Consent. But there should be another headline, Why Are So Many Tests Being Done Without an Examination?
Dr. Sara Wainberg reports in The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology that pelvic examinations are being done by medical students without the patient's permission. They were performed after patients were anesthetized prior to hysterectomy or other pelvic procedures. This gynecological learning process has been utilized for years in teaching hospitals without newspaper headlines.
The criticism is that the procedure is done without informed consent. This is a valid ethical complaint and is easily corrected by obtaining a patient's consent. But this teaching technique, to my knowledge, has never resulted in a patient's death or needless worry. And, compared to other grave ethical issues in our society, I question whether it deserves newspaper headlines, or publication in a leading medical journal.
Dr. Wainberg would be better advised to carry out a research study on wide-awake patients. How the failure to do pelvic examinations at all can cause patient deaths. Or, result in a huge amount of worry. And why so many CT scans and MRIs are being done on women rather than a pelvic examination.
I learned two important things at The Harvard Medical School. One, it is essential to listen to the patient. If you listen long enough, patients may themselves reveal the diagnosis. Two, you must examine the patient. Today, these two essential steps are taking second place to technology.
It's doesn't take rocket science to understand that it makes sense for a doctor to do a pelvic examination. After all, how would a mechanic diagnose the car's problem if he fails to open the hood? But over the years, all too often, I've seen wide-awake patients with pelvic complaints who have not had an internal pelvic examination by their doctor. This can have disastrous consequences.
As an instance, a young woman who had been practising to be a concert pianist for years was within a few months of her piano debut in Toronto. She had complained to several doctors that she had noticed increasing amounts of vaginal discharge for well over a year. Doctors had prescribed a number of medications without any effect.
Finally, she decided to get another opinion because, "none of the doctors had examined me", she explained. Unfortunately, when the pelvic examination was done she showed an advanced cancer of the cervix, which could have been treated many months earlier. She died before giving her recital.
Another woman was suffering from increasing discomfort with menstrual periods and severe pain during sexual intercourse. She had seen several doctors. The ultrasounds they prescribed had always been reported normal. Later, she was placed on birth control pills that had no affect on her pain and was told her trouble was psychological. A simple pelvic examination would have pinpointed the diagnosis -- endometriosis.
This disease is the result of internal bleeding during periods. What happens is that the lining of the uterus, normally only present in the uterus, becomes implanted on other organs inside the abdomen. So when the normal lining bleeds during a period, the abnormally displaced lining also bleeds. It's this internal bleeding that causes pain during periods and sexual intercourse.
Endometriosis may form bloodfilled ovarian cysts. These cysts can be easily diagnosed by ultrasound. But quite often this disease causes severe scarring of ligaments at the end of the vagina. It's this scarring that can cause severe pain during sex. But I've yet to see a case where this scarring can be diagnosed by ultrasound. So if a pelvic examination is not done the diagnosis will be missed and patients may be told the problem is psychological.
One of my former professors used to drum this message into his students about failing to do an internal examination. He remarked, "If you don't put your finger in, you will put your foot in it!"
Yes, I agree with Dr. Wainberg that sleeping patients should give their permission prior to a pelvic examination. But, let's also be sure that wide-awake patients get the pelvic examinations they deserve.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 5, 2010 A21
More Your Health
- Back to Top
- Return to Your Health
Most Popular Your Health
- 'You look fantastic,' Ellen DeGeneres tells beaming Helene Campbell
- New book details Obama's fondness for weed while a Hawaiian high school student
- Alberta police, fire crews, paramedics get help fighting post-traumatic stress
- Schizophrenia drug may help prevent some cancers from recurring: study
- Raise prices of caffeinated alcohol drinks, discourage sale in bars: report
- Doctor house calls part of Ontario plan to keep seniors at home longer
- Tanning-salon restrictions take effect June 15
- Rick Hansen named honorary colonel of military support unit
- Man who beheaded fellow bus passenger thought victim was an alien: supporter
- Tories say Ornge running $14.5-million deficit, according to 2011 documents
- 'You look fantastic,' Ellen DeGeneres tells beaming Helene Campbell
- Man who beheaded fellow bus passenger thought victim was an alien: supporter
- Tanning-salon restrictions take effect June 15
- Gills onions and Compliments salads recalled in Listeria scare
- Schizophrenia drug may help prevent some cancers from recurring: study
- Pandemic flu shot linked to lower rates of death, preterm birth in infants
- Rick Hansen named honorary colonel of military support unit
- Cervical cancer treatment device recalled; couldn't be fully cleaned
- New Zealand raises tobacco taxes sharply, aiming to become smoke-free country
- Doctor house calls part of Ontario plan to keep seniors at home longer
- Report finds poor diet remains recipe for disaster as Canadians get older
- 'You look fantastic,' Ellen DeGeneres tells beaming Helene Campbell
- Man who beheaded fellow bus passenger thought victim was an alien: supporter
- Pros and cons of pacifiers can leave parents pondering what's best for baby
- Double-lung recipient Helene Campbell discharged from hospital
- Tanning-salon restrictions take effect June 15
- Free Viagra and transgender surgery on the chopping block at DND: sources
- UN food envoy provokes Ottawa with findings on hunger and poor diet in Canada
- There is hope for women with decreased sex drives
- Two lung transplant patient Helene Campbell out of hospital, back on treadmill
- Some facts about the cost of mental illness to Canadians
- Gills onions and Compliments salads recalled in Listeria scare
- Rick Hansen named honorary colonel of military support unit
- Schizophrenia drug may help prevent some cancers from recurring: study
- Alberta police, fire crews, paramedics get help fighting post-traumatic stress
- Canada's first-ever mental health strategy will pressure Harper to act
- Ontario cutting hundreds of OHIP fees paid to doctors as talks reach standstill
- Saskatchewan toddler strapped to back of ATV survives underwater plunge
- Expansion of B.C. insulin pump program would save millions, says CDA
- Pros and cons of pacifiers can leave parents pondering what's best for baby
- Report finds poor diet remains recipe for disaster as Canadians get older
- Important to find out reason for fatigue
- Fat cat dies of respiratory distress
- U.S. FDA warns of injuries, deaths linked to 'liberation therapy' for MS
- Alzheimer's focus shifts to testing therapies earlier, before patients show many symptoms
- Natural medicine best for lowering cholesterol
- There is hope for women with decreased sex drives
- Seven fired after privacy breach at Peterborough, Ont., hospital
- Stressed out? Turn off email
Ads by Google









You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010; View the changes. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.