Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 02/12/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
TORONTO -- A new study suggests the way babies are born and fed in early life affects the bacteria they carry around in their gut.
And that in turn may influence their future health, including such things as whether they will develop asthma, allergies or other medical conditions.
The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Alberta, is published in this week's issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Senior author Anita Kozyrskyj said it is important medical teams and parents understand the choices made about mode of delivery and method of feeding have an impact.
She and colleagues studied the gut microbiomes of 24 infants; that's the term for the diverse collection of bacteria people carry in their intestinal tracts.
They found distinct differences in the numbers and types of bacteria present when they compared babies born by caesarean section to those born by vaginal birth, as well as babies breastfed and fed with formula.
"There are a lot of things we don't know about the impact of health-care interventions such as caesarean section delivery on the developing infant," said Kozyrskyj. "To date, most of the evidence informing physicians and I guess families too is focused on the mother," said Kozyrskyj, who is a research chair and associate professor in the department of pediatrics at the University of Alberta.
It's long been known people carry an enormous number of bacteria in and on their bodies, most of which are benign or even helpful. For instance, friendly bacteria in the gut help protect against invaders that are ingested with contaminated food and could cause illness.
It's said bacteria in the gut outnumber the cells in the respiratory tract by a ratio of 10 to one.
In recent years, though, it has become increasingly clear the wrong balance of bacteria can have negative health implications.
Kozyrskyj and colleagues used a DNA sequencing technique to identify the bacteria in 24 babies' guts by studying a stool sample from each. The samples were taken when the babies were four months old.
They found a greater variety of bacteria in the children born vaginally as compared to those that were born by planned C-section -- though babies born by emergency C-section had an even higher variety of bacteria than those born vaginally. Infants who were exclusively breastfed had a less varied collection of gut bacteria than those who were bottle fed. But in this case, more isn't necessarily better, Kozyrskyj said. Some of the bacteria found in the stools of bottle-fed babies were the types that could cause illness, such as Clostridium difficile, which can cause diarrhea.
-- The Canadian Press
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 12, 2013 A2
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Mosquito-borne virus infects Cdn travellers
Use Chia Seeds With Caution, Researcher Warns
Study finds drugs still in recalled supplements
Five hospitals to assess, treat Ebola in B.C.
Teen Sisters Develop Ways to Measure Lung, Heart Damage
Ebola Vaccines May Be Deployed in West Africa by January, Officials Say
Binge Drinking May Boost Blood Pressure in Young Men
Research Shows No Link Between Vaccinations, Risk for Multiple Sclerosis
Tall, Heavy 1-Year-Olds May Be at Risk for Obesity Later, Study Finds
Black Women Fare Worse With Fertility Treatments, Study Says
Health Highlights: Oct. 21, 2014
CDC releases revised Ebola gear guidelines
Gene May Help Shield Hispanic Women From Breast Cancer, Study Says
Ebola Anxiety: A Bigger Threat Now Than the Virus Itself
Traffic Pollution May Be a Risk While Pregnant
Living With a Smoker Like Living in a Polluted City: Study
Health Tip: Dish Up Healthier Halloween Goodies
Health Tip: Snacking After School
Smart blade to measure figure skaters' force
CDC Tightens Rules on Caring for Ebola Patients
Passengers From Ebola-Affected Countries Must Land at Designated U.S. Airports
Ebola: Why virus kills some, other people survive