Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 05/3/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
What would you do in this situation? The patient is paralyzed, incontinent of bowel and urinary functions, unable to take nourishment and obviously in pain. I doubt anyone, regardless of race or religion, would disagree with a lethal injection if the patient were a beloved dog. But humans in most nations are denied this right.
Currently, a tennis partner of mine is in this same condition, along with Alzheimer's disease. His has been a frightful sight to watch as it progressed as surely as night follows day. He no longer knows me, stares day after day at blank walls. I know from past talks he would prefer a dignified death.
Alzheimer's disease has been labelled the Grey Tsunami, and it has huge implications for families and our health-care system. Every 70 seconds, a new case of Alzheimer's disease is diagnosed in North America. This means one in 11 seniors will develop this disease. Currently 5.3 million Americans and 500,000 Canadians suffer from it and related dementia. It's small wonder Alzheimer's disease is the second-most-feared disease.
Some researchers say that it's possible, by a combination of physical and mental activity, to improve brain activity. But there's a problem. My friend was as active physically and mentally as anyone I know. He was an ardent athlete, spoke two languages, devoured figures of the Wall Street Journal daily. Now he can't add 2+2 and I doubt anything could have been done to change this outcome. Once Alzheimer's strikes, the rules of the game are fixed.
Today North Americans are living longer and it's extremely dangerous to get older. Some will develop Lou Gehrig's disease, or a number of other chronic degenerative problems that make life a living hell at the end.
It's ironic that we have a Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, but no such society for humans. Unfortunately, even expressing an opinion today about assisted death is hazardous. As Voltaire remarked, "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."
When I express my opinion on assisted death, a vocal minority invariably says I want to exterminate the sick and establish death camps. They question whether I ever went to medical school or why I don't accept God. This is an unjust judgment when I've spent my life saving lives. Moreover, polls indicate a majority of North Americans agree with doctor-assisted death. It's absurd that Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides freedom in so many questionable ways, yet is so inhumane when it comes to the right to die with dignity.
I do not promote assisted death to anyone. But in a democratic nation, we should be allowed to sign a legal document stating if we become thoughtless, incontinent and immobile, we can choose this action.
One of Harvard's most distinguished medical professors once remarked, "The secret of caring for the patient is caring for the patient." But after years of caring for patients, he himself developed a devastating, fatal illness. Just before he committed suicide, he left a note saying, "It's wrong that society forced me to end my life this way without help."
But change is in the air. There's growing support for the people's right to self-determination. Assisted death is now permitted in seven countries and states and is being debated in Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Britain.
Recently, Montana's Supreme Court ruled physicians cannot be prosecuted for prescribing lethal medication for terminally ill patients.
Opponents cry that abuses will abound if this legislation is passed. But history proves otherwise. Oregon's legislation was passed in 1998 without triggering an epidemic of assisted deaths. Even in Switzerland, the most liberal of all nations, assisted deaths account for only 0.5 per cent of deaths in that country.
The point is that there should be no need to buy a one-way ticket to Zurich. It's time to talk about it, as no one will care as much about how you die as you will.
See the website www.docgiff.com For comments, email@example.com
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 3, 2013 A19
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Boil order issued for Newfoundland town
Ontario urged to prevent obstetrics closure
Surgical wait times too long: Opposition
B.C. to ban e-cigarette sales to youth
Birth most common reason for hospitalization in Manitoba: study
WHO to begin large-scale testing of Ebola vaccine in Guinea
Last Ebola patient is released in Liberia
'Superbug' infections hit another Los Angeles hospital
Chain of kidney transplants begins at San Francisco hospital
Cancer project nears participant goal
Second Los Angeles hospital reports 'superbug' infections
Children in Southern California breathing easier, study says
CPP disability cheques finally arriving
Flu winds down as FDA aims for better vaccine next winter
Canada sending Ebola help to Guinea
Small pipeline blast east of Edmonton
Ambulance fees need to be capped: NDP
UN: World eating too much sugar; cut to 5-10 per cent of diet
NDP criticizes stopwatch tracking of nurse
Ring taken from cancer patient's room
Health officials perplexed by vaccination skeptics
Unlabelled product could be Botox: Health Canada
Talks to determine unions for health workers
Nurse injured in attack at B.C. hospital: police
About 1,200 B.C. workers to be laid off: union
Li's risk of offending again is low: experts
Government 'spike unit' taking on SST cases
Vancouver police warn about fentanyl
Pesticide likely killed two Quebec sisters: coroner
Ont Liberals slam Tory MP for sex-ed remarks
Lean savings estimate totals $125M: minister
More on-campus meningitis vaccinations coming
Doctor recalls era of measles before vaccine
Survey: Parents increasingly ask doctors to delay vaccines
Illnesses prompt Toronto meat recall
Searching for a theory on survival
Training Basket: Leila Mostaço-Guidolin
Sun's damage continues after exposure
Bus beheader could be moved to group home
A list of decisions in the case of Vince Li