Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 10/12/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
WASHINGTON -- I've often wondered why eye contact -- which is supposed to make you feel good because your conversational partner is paying attention to you and not her phone -- can actually feel like an attempt to vacuum out your soul through your eyeballs. Unless the circumstances are exactly right, the midair meeting of two gazes can be awkward and unsettling. Better to examine a shoe. Better to only speak from within a cave, engulfed in fumes, like the oracle at Delphi.
We're told eye contact is a powerful thing. Hypnotists (and vampires) use it to get inside your head; public speakers use it to create an emotional connection. Parents tell kids to "look at me when I'm talking to you," because returning a gaze is supposed to communicate receptivity. But is it true that staring directly into someone's pupils gives you special powers of persuasion over him or her?
Eye contact is the topic of a new paper in the journal Psychological Science. Wondering whether college students were more or less likely to agree with a speaker after gazing into her eyes, authors Frances S. Chen and Julia A. Minson of the University of British Columbia hatched two experiments. In the first, 20 participants completed surveys indexing where they stood on a series of flashpoint issues, including assisted suicide, nuclear energy and university tuition. The volunteers then wore eye-tracking technology while viewing Internet videos of people arguing for or against those same controversies.
Interesting finding No. 1: Participants who agreed with the pundits before even watching the videos stared more at their eyes. Apparently when you are in the process of bonding with someone over a shared fervour for college-tuition reductions, you want to drink in her gaze -- this aligns with previous research linking eye contact to "affiliative behaviours."
Unsurprisingly, these participants reported watching the videos did not shift their thinking on the issues, since the pundits were just voicing opinions they already held. But of the volunteers who disagreed with the videos, those who stared into the eyes of the recorded speakers were also more likely to stand firm. Volunteers who looked away -- at the speakers' lips or at the ground, for instance -- were more frequently persuaded to change their minds.
In a second experiment, Chen and Minson made two tweaks to their procedure: They presented volunteers only with videos they were inclined to disagree with, and they instructed the volunteers to focus on either the speaker's eyes or mouth the whole time. Interesting finding No. 2: Participants in the eye condition were less persuaded by the pre-recorded arguments than those in the mouth condition.
According to the researchers, this may be because eye contact -- long associated with romantic spaghetti dinners and intense spiritual communion -- is actually really intimidating and scary.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 12, 2013 D4
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Glass maker deals to exit Apple, Arizona plant
Cloud business lifts Microsoft's quarterly results
A blue Christmas for Amazon?
Amazon misses Street 3Q forecasts
Nokia turnaround since handset unit sale continues
2K returns to hockey with new mobile title
Digital wallets pose financial risk: advisers
Rogers Q3 misses profit estimate
Big battles, tiny package
Early Apple computer sells for $905K at auction
Tablets, cars drive AT&T wireless gains - not phones
Google unveils app for managing Gmail inboxes
Open Text posts higher revenues, profits
Survey: Harassment a common part of online life
Samsung debuts new Nook tablet with larger screen
'Silicon Beach' brings tech boom to Los Angeles
Apple issues security warning for iCloud
Celestica says CEO to retire next year
Record iPhone sales drive Apple's 3Q beat
Facebook sues law firms, claims fraud
Amaya reviewing Cadillac Jack business
IBM misses Street 3Q forecasts
Netflix partners with Rogers for TV series
IBM 3Q disappoints as it sheds 'empty calories'
Do cases FBI cites support encryption worries?