Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 10/12/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
WASHINGTON -- I've often wondered why eye contact -- which is supposed to make you feel good because your conversational partner is paying attention to you and not her phone -- can actually feel like an attempt to vacuum out your soul through your eyeballs. Unless the circumstances are exactly right, the midair meeting of two gazes can be awkward and unsettling. Better to examine a shoe. Better to only speak from within a cave, engulfed in fumes, like the oracle at Delphi.
We're told eye contact is a powerful thing. Hypnotists (and vampires) use it to get inside your head; public speakers use it to create an emotional connection. Parents tell kids to "look at me when I'm talking to you," because returning a gaze is supposed to communicate receptivity. But is it true that staring directly into someone's pupils gives you special powers of persuasion over him or her?
Eye contact is the topic of a new paper in the journal Psychological Science. Wondering whether college students were more or less likely to agree with a speaker after gazing into her eyes, authors Frances S. Chen and Julia A. Minson of the University of British Columbia hatched two experiments. In the first, 20 participants completed surveys indexing where they stood on a series of flashpoint issues, including assisted suicide, nuclear energy and university tuition. The volunteers then wore eye-tracking technology while viewing Internet videos of people arguing for or against those same controversies.
Interesting finding No. 1: Participants who agreed with the pundits before even watching the videos stared more at their eyes. Apparently when you are in the process of bonding with someone over a shared fervour for college-tuition reductions, you want to drink in her gaze -- this aligns with previous research linking eye contact to "affiliative behaviours."
Unsurprisingly, these participants reported watching the videos did not shift their thinking on the issues, since the pundits were just voicing opinions they already held. But of the volunteers who disagreed with the videos, those who stared into the eyes of the recorded speakers were also more likely to stand firm. Volunteers who looked away -- at the speakers' lips or at the ground, for instance -- were more frequently persuaded to change their minds.
In a second experiment, Chen and Minson made two tweaks to their procedure: They presented volunteers only with videos they were inclined to disagree with, and they instructed the volunteers to focus on either the speaker's eyes or mouth the whole time. Interesting finding No. 2: Participants in the eye condition were less persuaded by the pre-recorded arguments than those in the mouth condition.
According to the researchers, this may be because eye contact -- long associated with romantic spaghetti dinners and intense spiritual communion -- is actually really intimidating and scary.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 12, 2013 D4
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
SpaceX launches 3-D printer, other station gear
Big, hairy spiders not scary
Uber ride-sharing service kicks off in Anchorage
Bad weather delays SpaceX launch with 3-D printer
Spain's Telefonica buys Brazilian operator GVT
Alibaba stock soars in jubilant trading debut
Home Depot says malware affected 56M payment cards
Alibaba's plan: Today, China. Tomorrow, the world.
US: Yet more global heat records fall in August
'Goblin Sword' top paid iPhone game app
'Goblin Sword' top paid iPhone app
Prime-time Netflix streams in Canada triple: report
Telus issues its first 'transparency' report
Latest entry in Sims series ages gracefully with only minor tweaks and refinements
Upgrade to iOS 8 now or wait?
Review: Devices, apps act like one under iOS 8
Taxi group seeks to stop Uber, Lyft in New Mexico
Quebecor CFO: Wind partnership a possibility
NASA's Maven spacecraft reaches Mars this weekend
Do distracted driving laws cover smartwatches?
Self-driving cars now need a permit in California
Web filter lifts block on gay sites
NASA picks Boeing and SpaceX to ferry astronauts
Back to school cause of spike in sick kids
Correction: Music-U2-iTunes story
Slyce buys Israeli developer of Pounce app
Taxi! Seeking women to drive for female passengers
Alibaba raises IPO price range on strong demand
Hitchcock movie affects vegetative patient
NASA inspector blasts asteroid protection program
Chinese city creates cellphone sidewalk lane
Apple: Record 4M orders of iPhones on 1st day
'Minecraft' could boost Microsoft's mobile reach
European Space Agency picks site for comet landing