Overcast

Winnipeg, MB

19°c Overcast

Full Forecast

Latest News

Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Clearest argument against death penalty

Posted: 09/4/2014 12:59 PM | Comments: 0

Advertisement

  • Print
Henry McCollum, who spent more than three decades in prison for the rape and murder of an 11-year-old girl, shown here in a picture before he was set to be freed after investigators linked DNA at the crime scene to a Robeson County man serving life for a similar rape murder.

TRAVIS LONG / RALEIGH NEWS & OBSERVER / MCT Enlarge Image

Henry McCollum, who spent more than three decades in prison for the rape and murder of an 11-year-old girl, shown here in a picture before he was set to be freed after investigators linked DNA at the crime scene to a Robeson County man serving life for a similar rape murder.

Perhaps you remember Henry Lee McCollum.

His is a name that comes up regularly when the death penalty is discussed, because the crime for which he was convicted — the brutal 1983 rape and murder of an 11-year-old girl — tests the thresholds many of us have regarding when someone should or shouldn’t be put to death.

McCollum, of North Carolina, was part of a death penalty debate between U.S. Supreme Court justices in 1994, and he was featured in a 2010 mailing from the N.C. Republican Party that attacked a Democratic state senator for being soft on the death penalty. The mailing featured a picture of McCollum and described his crimes in detail.

And now, it turns out those crimes are not his.

McCollum and his brother, Leon Brown, were released Wednesday after DNA evidence tied the 1983 rape and murder to someone else. McCollum and Brown, both of whom are mentally disabled, had signed confessions after hours of questioning with no lawyers present. There was no physical evidence tying either to the rape or murder.

Can there be a clearer argument against the death penalty? It is this simple: Be it sloppy police work or prosecutorial misconduct or flawed eyewitness testimony, people are wrongly convicted of murder. Some are sentenced to death. And it is not rare.

Just last month, a Durham, N.C., judge freed Darryl A. Howard from death row, calling the prosecution that led to his conviction the most "horrendous" he had seen in 34 years as a judge. Also last month, a Superior Court judge and a U.S. District Attorney in Washington, D.C. said that DNA evidence showed Kevin Martin, who had served 26 years for murder, was innocent.

Since 1989, 18 people who have served time on death row have been exonerated by DNA evidence, according to the non-profit Innocence Project. Another 16 were exonerated after being convicted of capital crimes but not sentenced to death. Overall, DNA has overturned more than 300 wrongful convictions nationally. Dozens, like McCollum’s, were the result of false confessions.

Certainly, there are far more confessions that are true and murder convictions that are legitimate — some for truly abhorrent crimes. Such is what Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia argued in 1994 when the court declined to review a death row case in Texas.

Scalia, in arguing that the death penalty was not cruel or unusual punishment, cited the gruesome crime for which McCollum had been convicted a decade before. "How enviable a quiet death by lethal injection compared with that!" the justice wrote.

Now, the murderer is not a murderer, and those who were so sure he deserved to die must ask: How many more Henry Lee McCollums might there be?

—The Charlotte Observer

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.