Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Committee nixes audit of mayor's, chairs' discretionary spending

  • Print

A council committee turned down a request this afternoon to audit the discretionary spending of the Mayor’s Office and that of the committee chairs.

Councillors Paula Havixbeck and John Orlikow wanted the mayor’s $116,000 discretionary spending and the $7,000 given to each chair of executive policy committee to be included in the 2013 audit conducted by the city auditor.

But a majority of committee members said the auditor had enough work to do for this year, and the discretionary spending is already being examined as part of comprehensive review of councillors’ ward allowance spending.

"The need to be open and transparent has never before been higher," Havixbeck (Charleswood-Tuxedo) told the governance committee. "There is a different set of rules applied on the mayor’s budget and on the chairmanships’ budgets."

Havixbeck said the discretionary funds allocated to the five chairs of EPC should be subject to the same rules that govern how the councillors spend their ward allowances, known formally as their discretionary allowance.

There are regulations that govern eligible councillor expenses, Havixbeck said, but those regulations are not applied to the additional $7,000 a councillor receives as committee chair or to the mayor’s discretionary budget.

Orlikow (River Heights – Fort Garry) said no one is making allegations about improper spending, but subjecting that spending to audit is the right thing to do.

"I go on the principle of lead by example," Orlikow said. "The more we can be open and the more we can be accountable, it helps everything."

Unclear how chairs' cash should be spent: Havixbeck

Orlikow said he doesn’t understand why the same oversight applied to councillors isn’t applied to the mayor’s office and the committee chairs.

Councillors have a ward budget of about $116,000. Spending is subject to specific criteria.

Councillors who are appointed chair of one of the five executive policy committees – protection and community services, infrastructure renewal and public works, finance, downtown development, property and development – receive an additional $7,000, which is not subject to review.

The mayor’s office also has a discretionary fund of about $116,000. There are no rules governing what constitutes eligible expenses but the mayor’s office does post the spending online.

Recently, Coun. Harvey Smith was questioned over his decision to spend $1,600 on fake street signs to highlight the problems of deteriorating back lanes – but he listed it as advertising. The governance committee ruled it wasn’t advertising but let it slide.

Coun. Devi Sharma said the question of oversight for the discretionary spending is being looked as part of a comprehensive review by the committee, and the offices of the city clerk and city auditor.

Sharma (Old Kildonan) said it’s premature to subject the mayor and committee chair’s discretionary spending to audit before the review is complete.

Committee chair Grant Nordman, who is also council speaker, said it would be unfair to impose new spending rules on committee chairs and the mayor’s office.

Nordman said he expected recommendations from the comprehensive review would be released by May 2014 and in place following council elections next fall.

Havixbeck said when she was a committee chair she asked how the additional $7,000 was to be spent but she was never given a clear answer.

"Some said it was for travel, some said it was for additional meals …but I never got a clear answer," Havixbeck said, adding she believes that each member of a committee should get a share of that $7,000 for related committee work.

aldo.santin@freepress.mb.ca

 

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Jets This Week: Predicting the line-ups

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A monarch butterfly looks for nectar in Mexican sunflowers at Winnipeg's Assiniboine Park Monday afternoon-Monarch butterflys start their annual migration usually in late August with the first sign of frost- Standup photo– August 22, 2011   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • JOE.BRYKSA@FREEPRESS.MB.CA Local-(Standup photo)- Humming Around- A female ruby -throated hummingbird fly's through the bee bomb  flowers Friday at the Assiniboine Park English Garden- Nectar from flowers are their main source of food. Hummingbirds wings can beat as fast as 75x times second. Better get a glimpse of them soon the birds fly far south for the winter - from Mexico to South America- JOE BRYKSA/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS- Sept 10, 2009

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you think e-cigarettes should be banned by the school division?

View Results

Ads by Google