Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 03/26/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
CITY of Winnipeg officials quashed an attempt to post ads outside city hall, publicizing the conflict-of-interest court case between restaurateur Joe Chan and Mayor Sam Katz.
Coun. Harvey Smith (Daniel McIntyre) said he wanted to advertise the fact that Chan's case against the mayor will go to court on April 2.
Chan alleges Katz violated Manitoba's Municipal Council Conflict of Interest Act in December 2010 by spending taxpayer funds on a Christmas party at Hu's Asian Bistro, an Ellice Avenue restaurant the mayor owned at the time.
The case goes to court next week. If a judge decides Katz has violated provincial rules, he will lose his seat.
Smith said he and Chan contacted Winnipeg OMG, an outdoor marketing company that has a contract to supply the city with recycling boxes, in the hope of displaying Chan vs. Katz ads on two recycling boxes located on Main Street and King Street.
The marketing company's contract requires the City of Winnipeg to vet any potentially controversial ads. City officials deemed the Chan vs. Katz ad was not in "good character."
Smith decided to put the sign up on his Simcoe Street residence instead, and the two recycling boxes outside city hall currently display ads for Chan's Cathay House restaurant.
Katz's office declined to comment on Monday.
"I couldn't understand why the city would not allow us to put the sign on the trash cans, because I'm not attacking the mayor, I'm not attacking Joe Chan; I'm just informing (the public) of the trial date," Smith said Monday.
City of Winnipeg spokeswoman Tammy Melesko said in an email the city's public works department manages the Winnipeg OMG contract and determined the ad "was encouraging a public demonstration of a confrontation between two individuals."
Winnipeg OMG president Paul Sawatzky said controversial ads are rare and the city has only had to review potentially sensitive material "a couple of times" in the company's last nine years in business.
Last year, Chan filed a declaration in Court of Queen's Bench alleging Katz engaged in a conflict of interest. After making procedural errors, Chan, who has worked for Smith, withdrew his motion and had to pay $750 in court costs.
Chan's complaint was then picked up by human rights lawyer David Matas, who filed another declaration and secured the April court date.
Robert Tapper, Katz's lawyer, said his position is Chan did not follow proper court procedures and the Christmas party did not violate the conflict-of-interest act, as it was not a council or committee meeting. He also alleges Chan fabricated evidence.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition March 26, 2013 B1
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Bourque to serve at least 75 years in prison
Police, medical examiner intervene in battle over autopsies in dead infants case
Photos raise question about sex conviction: lawyer
Zoo's new polar bear cubs meet the public
US judge rejects Ebola quarantine for nurse
Why do victims stay silent? No easy answer
School tests fail to capture human complexity
First Iraq missions over, no bombs dropped
Drivers scramble for flying cash on US highway
Government announces live-in caregiver changes
Sinclair issues challenge to help heal pain of schools
Crisis bogs down legislature
Ambulance turn-around times at hospitals continue to rise despite NDP pledges
Rob Ford needs more cancer treatments
Hungary suspends Internet tax after huge protests
Man charged in death of Ryan Sinclair
First face-to-face talks over Jenpeg protest
Rowling reveals new tidbits on Pottermore site
Sony's quarterly loss balloons on mobile woes
Julianne Moore ready for her close-up, but Cronenberg's Hollywood evisceration doesn't measure up
Soccer field stabbing case pushed to Nov. 20
Students learn about Canada's history, people at city cemetery
Halloween forecast not too chilling
Poll finds two-thirds of pet owners would pay $35 monthly surcharge to keep their critter