Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 02/3/2014 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
A libel action is a double-edged sword. It's that rare legal action that can leave a plaintiff -- the party that sues -- mortally wounded. The National Council of Canadian Muslims' threatened libel suit against the Harper government is a case in point.
The NCCM, which describes itself as a non-partisan and non-profit group that's worked 14 years on human rights issues on behalf of Canadian Muslims, has given preliminary notice of its intention to sue Prime Minister Stephen Harper, his chief spokesman and the federal government for libel. It has filed a libel notice in an Ontario court that accuses the prime minister's director of communications, Jason MacDonald, of making a false and defamatory statement that linked it to a terrorist group.
In mid-January, MacDonald rejected NCCM's criticism of the prime minister's decision to include Rabbi Daniel Karobkin of Toronto as part of his delegation on his Middle East trip. In a widely released letter to the PMO, the NCCM had linked Karobkin to those "promoting hateful views" of Muslims.
MacDonald, in replying to questions about NCCM's criticism said: "We will not take seriously criticism from an organization with documented ties to a terrorist organization such as Hamas." The Canadian government designated Hamas a terrorist entity in 2002.
The prime minister and Mr. MacDonald have put themselves in a dicey legal position. Unless they can furnish the documented proof Mr. MacDonald cited, they'd best retract the statement and quickly apologize to NCCM or they're apt to face a substantial damages award against them at trial for coupling NCCM and Hamas.
On the other hand, if the government can link either NCCM or CAIR-Canada, its former name, to Hamas, the libel suit will fail and the organization will be indelibly discredited.
Thus both sides face a big risk if the libel claim goes to trial.
The legal standoff is now at a critical stage. It's at a juncture where, though notice has been served as required by law, no libel suit has actually been commenced. If the government and NCCM are going to settle out of court, this is the most opportune time to do so, before claims and defences are filed in the court and legal costs start to escalate.
But settlement -- via apology, retraction, partial retraction or even an agreed-upon amendment of MacDonald's statement -- is unlikely. There's every chance this libel claim will go the distance. And at the end of the litigation, one side or the other is going to pay big time -- either in dollars or reputation.
Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board, comprising Catherine Mitchell, David O’Brien, Shannon Sampert, and Paul Samyn.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 3, 2014 A8
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Arrest in home invasion involving D-Day vet
Twitter account isn't mine: Magnotta judge
Police seek driver after pickup truck hits pedestrian
Birth in a northern nation
Volunteers in annual drive get those hampers out to families
Sony saga blends foreign intrigue, star wattage
Protesters: 'It's not the time' for more Cuba ties
Police arrest suspect in daylight gas bar robbery
Police nab 8 in street gang drug bust
Remains may be decade old
Sources: Doneil Henry headed to West Ham
Protecting NDP values: Oswald
Jets' Byfuglien back on the ice after late-game mishap
N. Korea proposes joint probe over Sony hacking
From freezing drizzle and fog to snow
The measure of the man
'I don't want to die a drunk'
Students help homeless stay clean, healthful
Birtle farm boy goes global
CentreVenture boss got a lot done
Sleep in the Greatest Manitoban's log cabin
Half of Manitobans support Gang of Five
Stevenson defends WBC belt with KO win
The terrible lessons we teach our kids