Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Motorist wins drunk-driving appeal, still faces trial

  • Print

It may have seemed like an open-and-shut drunk-driving case: A Winnipeg man is pulled over outside a bar, submits to a breathalyzer and fails miserably.

But thanks to a police paperwork snafu, the accused's seemingly slam-dunk conviction has been overturned on appeal.

Stanley Fryza was arrested two years ago during a Christmas Checkstop as he left the Marion Hotel. He produced blood-alcohol readings of .11 and .13.

Fryza was convicted at trial of driving over the legal limit of .08 based on those readings. His lawyer immediately appealed after discovering a technical glitch in the evidence: A certificate of analysis on Fryza's breathalyzer results had been photocopied by the arresting officer.

In the process, the copy given to the defence was missing part of the text that was inadvertently cut off. This included a portion of the "lot number of the alcohol standard" used in the testing process.

Although the evidence was stamped "Certified True Copy," the duplicate wasn't an exact match with the original.

Police told court it was an "innocent shifting of the paper" that caused the error and they didn't realized it until it was too late. The Crown said it didn't change the strong evidence against Fryza, as the original document clearly shows the accurate test results.

"The Crown argued... the copy provided to the accused was, in fact, a true copy, albeit a copy with a defect. It argued that the defect was not material information but, rather, surplusage," court documents obtained by the Free Press reveal.

But a Court of Queen's Bench judge disagreed, saying "an essential part of the certificate of analysis" had been altered in the disclosure process. The judge ruled the only remedy was to throw out the conviction and try the case again.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal, in a decision released this week, upheld that ruling. However, the Appeal Court refused Fryza's request to go a step further and enter an outright acquittal, which would have prevented the Crown from bringing his case back to court.

As the high court noted, Fryza likely has only delayed the inevitable.

"It is clear that in this case, evidence can be called at a new trial to remedy this defect, either by calling the breathalyzer technician who performed the breathalyzer test or the arresting officer, who was himself a qualified breathalyzer technician, to testify as to the test results, or by serving the accused with a new copy of the certificate of analysis," Justice Holly Beard wrote in the 18-page decision.

No new trial dates have been set.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 26, 2013 A12

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

Comments are not accepted on this story because they might prejudice a case before the courts.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Selinger addresses stadium lawsuit

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Marc Gallant/Winnipeg Free Press. Gardening Column- Assiniboine Park English Garden. July 19, 2002.
  • Marc Gallant / Winnipeg Free Press. Local- Deer in Canola field near Elma, Manitoba. 060706.

View More Gallery Photos


Are you concerned about the number of homicides so far this year?

View Results

Ads by Google