The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

No cause-effect relationship between orcas' health and salmon numbers: report

  • Print

VANCOUVER - Don't blame salmon fishermen for the plight of some endangered killer whales off the Pacific coast, says a newly released report.

After three international conferences and nearly 15 months of reflection, members of a joint Canada-U.S. panel studying Southern Resident Killer Whales have concluded there's no simple, linear, cause-and-effect relationship between the number of salmon available to the orcas and the population's growth.

The Independent Science Panel was struck by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 2011 and was asked to answer whether fishing reduced the supply of food to the whales and if that impeded their recovery.

The population is listed under the Species at Risk Act in Canada and under the Endangered Species Act in the U.S., and since the 1970s the numbers have been growing by less than one per cent.

"It's not a given that ... their health is being hindered by the fishery," said Larry Rutter, fisheries policy assistant with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

"There are many other competing hypothesis as to what's constraining the growth of the population, everything from toxins to noise to boat traffic to all kinds of things."

Southern Resident Killer Whales live almost exclusively in the Salish Sea and the Juan de Fuca Strait in the waters off British Columbia and Washington state between July and September.

But the report says between April and June, only about 32 per cent of the population lives in the area, with the remainder of sightings during those spring and early summer months taking place in waters off northern Oregon and Vancouver Island.

During the winter, members of the population are sometimes found off the coast of central California but more frequently appear off the coast of Washington state.

Between 1974 and 2011, the group's population has fluctuated between 67 and 95 animals, growing by a rate of 0.71 per cent a year. In contrast, members of another population, the Northern Resident Killer Whales, have increased from 120 animals in 1975 to more than 260 currently.

The report confirms chinook are an important part of the southern residents' diet, and evidence collected since 1994 indicates some pod members have been in poor condition, which is associated with higher mortality rates.

Yet the report cautions against concluding a reduction in the salmon catch would mean more fish for the killer whales.

That's because other orcas, and predators like seals and sea lions, feed on chinook at the same time as the Southern Residents, and harvest levels for chinook are already low, so there's limited opportunity to further reduce the catch, states the report.

The report said there is a statistical correlation between the population's survival rates and the abundance of chinook.

However it also said there is limited evidence linking the growth of the killer whale population with salmon availability.

"Because SRKW growth and salmon abundance data are observations of uncontrollable events obtained from an unknown sampling design, there is a high risk of incorrectly assigning causes to correlations and making weak inferences," concluded the report.

Rutter said officials at NOAA are studying the report and will have internal discussions before meeting with Canadian fishery officials over the issue.

He said a comment period will run until the end of January, allowing individuals who participated in the process and other interested parties to give input on the findings.

Officials in NOAA will then have to decide this winter if they'll make any fisheries' management decisions for the spring because of the report's findings, he said.

"The main question we have to decide is should fishing as we now manage it be modified in some way," Rutter said. "That's the central question."

Paul Macgillivray, a spokesman for DFO's Pacific region, said officials inside the department are now analyzing the report and trying to determine how it will be used to inform decision on killer whale recovery actions and salmon fisheries.

"We're in the process of looking through the report in more detail, and saying, 'OK, what do we glean from the advice that's provided,' and go from there," he said.

He said both agencies will then have a discussion and compare notes on whether the issue should be pursued further in the context of the Pacific Salmon Commission.

Macgillivray said it's too early to say if the report will impact salmon-fishing plans for 2013.

The panel included seven senior scientists from five Canadian and U.S. universities, as well as a non-university research institution.

Panel members were asked to evaluate the available scientific evidence and attended three workshops between September 2011 and September 2012 in Seattle, Wash., and Vancouver, B.C.

Their final report was made public on NOAA's website at the end of November.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Jets speak after 4-2 loss to Ducks in Game 1

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Water lilys are reflected in the pond at the Leo Mol Sculpture Garden Tuesday afternoon. Standup photo. Sept 11,  2012 (Ruth Bonneville/Winnipeg Free Press)
  • MIKE DEAL / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS 060711 Chris Pedersen breeds Monarch butterflies in his back yard in East Selkirk watching as it transforms from the Larva or caterpillar through the Chrysalis stage to an adult Monarch. Here an adult Monarch within an hour of it emerging from the Chrysalis which can be seen underneath it.

View More Gallery Photos


Do you agree with the sale of the Canadian Wheat Board to foreign companies?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google