Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

On which side of toilet-seat shape debate do you sit?

  • Print

Our efforts to dispel the mysteries of the modern visual landscape come to a head this week.

What are the chances you're reading this in the bathroom? Pretty good, apparently. Where else in this hectic world are you going to find the peace and quiet to read, plan your social life or check if you're the first person to consider pitching a show called The Real Housewives of King's Landing?

You're especially likely to be in the bathroom if you're an Android user, according to a 2012 study, which found that 87 per cent of such people regularly engage in what's been called "bogging," compared with a mere 77 per cent of iPhone users. Half of all water-damaged phones are damaged by, um, eau de toilette. I haven't seen any data on what percentage of Americans clean their phones after bathroom usage, but a recent study concluded that 16 per cent of our phones "have poop on them."

Lovely. But where were we? That's right: on the can. So, look down. Is the toilet seat U-shaped, like a horseshoe, with a gap in front? Or is it a continuous, O-shaped ring?

If you're in a public restroom, the seat is probably U-shaped. If you're enthroned at home, you're probably on an O-shaped seat. As a reader -- willing to be identified only as "Laurie from Edmonton" and reluctant to comment on the record about where she reads Slate -- asked in a recent email, what's the deal with the U-shaped ones?

Well, Laurie from Edmonton, there are many unsatisfying theories out there. Perhaps men are less careful in public toilets, "away from the restraining influence of their families," some have said. The U-shaped seat might stay cleaner if the seat isn't raised. Maybe guys don't want their business touching the seat away from home? But women's restrooms have the same seats -- and wouldn't the same reluctance apply at home, albeit to a lesser degree? Perhaps people are (unnecessarily) afraid of catching STDs from public toilet seats. Or maybe U-shaped seats are somehow easier to clean. And then there's the theory put forward by Pasha Malla at the online magazine Morning News: U-shaped seats use less material and so are cheaper to make and to clean.

Even Wikipedia is sending mixed signals. In the online encyclopedia's tome on toilet seats, the subsection on open front toilet seats also mulls various theories, e.g., that the U-shaped seat is ergonomically better. (How exactly? It's not clear, nor is there any explanation why the same logic wouldn't apply to home seats.) The next section states point blank that the reason for the U-shaped seat is to reduce "spatter" and make cleaning easier.

None of these theories is quite right. The original purpose for the U-shaped seat, according to Lynne Simnick, senior director of code development at IAPMO -- the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials -- was to aid women. Simnick explains that the open seat was designed to allow women "to wipe the perineal area after using the water closet" without contacting a seat that might be unhygienic.

Simnick notes that while women were the originally intended beneficiaries of the U-shaped seat requirement, men also benefit. The design "eliminates an area that could be contaminated with urine" and also "eliminates the user's genital contact with the seat."

There is a sensible exception to the Uniform Plumbing Code requirement. If a public restroom has an automatic toilet-seat cover dispenser, the seat doesn't need to be U-shaped.

 

-- Slate

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 29, 2013 D8

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Jets defencemen ready to face adversity

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Marc Gallant / Winnipeg Free Press. Local- Weather standup. Sundog. Refraction of light through ice crystals which caused both the sun dog and and fog along McPhillips Road early Wednesday morning. 071205.
  • June 25, 2013 - 130625  -  A storm lit up Winnipeg Tuesday, June 25, 2013. John Woods / Winnipeg Free Press - lightning

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you think the provincial NDP’s approval rating could drop below the current 26 per cent?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google