Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Red flags on flooding spending

Independent audit finds irregularities in Peguis; chief dismisses report

  • Print

The chief and council of Peguis First Nation paid themselves thousands of dollars in money earmarked for flood compensation, diverted thousands more to private consultants and hired unqualified staff as a make-work project for flood emergency operations.

Those findings -- obtained by the Free Press -- are among the red flags an independent management review and auditing firm in Ottawa has raised.

The outside review Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development ordered in November was tasked with tracking what happened to $10.5 million in federal flood-compensation funding.

It concluded due to "numerous significant control weaknesses" it was impossible to "provide assurances that all of the funds were spent for the intended purposes."

The Peguis audit was part of a broader review of how federal emergency assistance was managed for First Nations in the wake of the Manitoba 2011-12 floods.

Ottawa launched an investigation last month to find out why the number of flood evacuees in Winnipeg hotels had skyrocketed since last spring. Another investigation focuses on how the First Nations federal flood co-ordinator, the Manitoba Association of Native Fire Fighters, handled emergency assistance.

The Peguis review is the first indication Ottawa is scrutinizing the finances of individual First Nations and may go further than just recouping funds. Bands could also find themselves the focus of criminal investigations.

"Should substantiated indications of criminal activity be found to have taken place as part of this or any subsequent financial reviews, AANDC will turn this information over to the appropriate policing authorities," a federal spokeswoman said.

But Chief Glenn Hudson defended his administration on Tuesday, taking exception with findings his staff is unqualified or there are any legitimate grievances to find with the financial administration of flood compensation at the Interlake-area reserve.

Hudson said the band co-manager disputed the federal review in writing and filed a point-by-point rebuttal with Ottawa after chief and council reviewed Ottawa's harsh findings.

"Indian Affairs put us in co-management and those managers have to account for every dollar. They're responsible for co-management and administration of those funds," Hudson said.

He dismissed the audit as inaccurate and said it offered an incomplete picture of Peguis finances for flood spending.

"I can tell you outright, it's not accurate," Hudson said. "There are no truckloads of money going to chief and council. They don't have all the accurate findings and there are inaccuracies in their review and we've rebutted that," he said.

Ottawa provided a catalogue of issues with flood compensation in an 11-page letter sent to the Peguis chief and council March 14. In addition to the payments, the review cites instances of direct political interference.

"According to the flood co-ordinator, he regularly received text messages during flood season from chief and councillors asking that someone be considered for hiring. In some cases the individual required reduced duties because of medical issues," says the letter, signed by Sylvie Lecompte, director of the department's assessment and investigative services branch.

Among the expenditures questioned and financial record-keeping criticized was $41,000 for gravel that wasn't adequately justified and an allegation the administration tried to turn seasonal flood work into year-round jobs that would qualify for employment insurance. In another case, some $500,000 worth of flood-related work off-reserve was never billed for, although work was done in a neighbouring municipality and at least one other First Nation.

Ottawa also questioned items that could be described as compassionate gestures: Flood-affected families were given $150 credits for groceries at Peguis Family Foods in July 2010, an expense that does not qualify for emergency disaster assistance.

In the end, the review concluded mismanagement landed the Ojibwa First Nation in a crisis, with a cash crunch that affected the band and left householders holding the bag for millions of claims for flood damages that had yet to be filed by this January, let alone reimbursed by the provincial Emergency Measures Organization.

The letter concludes by warning Peguis could be on the hook for thousands of dollars Ottawa will claw back from the First Nation.

However, Hudson characterized the review as positioning Ottawa is taking as it negotiates final flood-compensation funding against payment advances previously made to the First Nation.

Residents at Peguis say they are livid over the alleged mismanagement.

"This overall excessive and unnecessary expenditure shows the great inefficiencies in the system where chief and council have the power to do whatever they want for their own vested interests," declared James Sinclair in an itemized analysis of the federal review.

Another band member, Kelly Sinclair, said: "Peguis members need to be aware of what is going on here. Our members are being told lie after lie about flood issues."

alexandra.paul@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 11, 2012 A3

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Keri Latimer looks for beauty in the dark and the spaces between the notes

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A Canada goose flies towards the sun near the Perimeter Highway North and Main St Monday afternoon – See Day 10 for Bryksa’s 30 goose project - May 11, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • A female Mallard duck leads a group of duckings on a morning swim through the reflections in the Assiniboine River at The Forks Monday.     (WAYNE GLOWACKI/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) Winnipeg Free Press  June 18 2012

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should the city grant mosquito buffer zones for medical reasons only?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google