A few clouds

Winnipeg, MB

13°c A few clouds

Full Forecast

Latest News

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Losing stadium bubble latest mess for which no one takes responsibility

Posted: 10/2/2013 3:18 AM | Comments: 0

Last Modified: 10/2/2013 7:04 AM | Updates

Advertisement

  • Print
No one is taking responsibility for problems at Investors Group Field.

JOHN WOODS / THE CANADIAN PRESS ARCHIVES Enlarge Image

No one is taking responsibility for problems at Investors Group Field.

Given the immense popularity of soccer and the presence of new footy facilities in the southern reaches of Winnipeg, there's no question the north side of the city also deserves an indoor venue where kids can kick around a ball.

Given the presence of an indoor soccer facility on the University of Manitoba campus, there's no question the placement of an inflatable dome over the playing surface at Investors Group Field during the winter would amount to an even greater concentration of recreation amenities on the south side of Winnipeg.

And given a Greg Selinger campaign promise in 2011 to build an indoor soccer facility north of the Assiniboine River, there's no question the NDP government should pursue that goal.

None of this, however, explains how the province, the Winnipeg Football Club or anyone else can justify the cancellation of the inflatable bubble long promised for Investors Group Field.

Early in 2008, when David Asper was the main proponent of a new football stadium for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers, the idea of an inflatable bubble was floated as a means of ensuring this new facility would serve more than just professional football.

At the time, Mayor Sam Katz said the bubble would allow the stadium to be used more than 300 days a year as opposed to a mere 110. Football Manitoba and the Winnipeg Rifles were told the bubble would serve as a practice and training facility. The public at large was told the bubble would improve access for amateur sport.

Of course, a lot has happened since 2008. The location of the proposed stadium moved from Polo Park to Point Douglas to the University of Manitoba. A deal to build the stadium was arranged with the Asper-owned Creswin Properties as the main proponent -- and then morphed into a project led by the football club itself, with the province as the main financial backer and the city providing construction oversight.

Finally, the stadium was built despite a dispute between the contractor and steel-fabricating subcontractor, opened a year late and is now managed by a football club with an interim president who played no role in its construction.

Somewhere along the line, the inflatable bubble for the stadium was abandoned. Selinger said this decision was made in the wake of a Winnipeg Soccer Federation request to redirect $1.8 million dedicated to that bubble toward a $19.1-million indoor soccer facility proposed for Garden City.

That decision, the premier said, was to avoid redundant amenities on the U of M campus and help build a much-needed soccer amenity in north Winnipeg. And that would be great -- if someone had disclosed this to a public sold on the idea of a bubble over Investors Group Field during the winter.

Did Creswin cancel plans for the bubble after the stadium moved to the U of M? David Asper isn't saying. "I'm not prepared to comment on this and would suggest that you ask BBB Stadium, which was responsible for the construction," he said via email late Tuesday.

BBB Stadium chairman Phil Sheegl, Winnipeg's chief administrative officer, declined to respond to a request for comment. So did the Winnipeg Football Club, leaving Selinger to place the impetus for the move on the Winnipeg Soccer Federation.

Perhaps the bubble was more expensive than $1.8 million. Perhaps the technology was problematic, as the premier also hinted this week. The problem is absence of transparency about what is just the latest hiccup in the stadium project.

How does a stadium get built in subarctic Winnipeg with a press box open to the elements? Nobody will own up to that blooper, which will cost the Bombers $350,000 to fix.

Who signed off on the installation of an entire stadium full of railings that weren't up to code and had to be replaced? Who approved a stadium design that didn't allow access to the field level, even though concerts were a major part of the Bombers' business plan for the new stadium? Why didn't BBB Stadium or contractor Stuart Olson Dominion Construction or former president Garth Buchko notice any of the design flaws or deal with them ahead of time?

Guess what, Winnipeg? Nobody will say. For all we know, Not Me from The Family Circus is responsible for making major decisions in capital projects financed by the City of Winnipeg, the Province of Manitoba and the Winnipeg Football Club.

The diffusion of responsibility for the Investors Group Field construction saga is emblematic of a political culture in which elected officials and public servants take no responsibility for their actions.

It wasn't just a bubble that disappeared from Investors Group Field. Also missing: any sense of accountability on behalf of the various players responsible for building what is now a $204-million stadium.

bartley.kives@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 2, 2013 B1

History

Updated on Wednesday, October 2, 2013 at 7:04 AM CDT: Chanegs headline, replaces photo

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.