Business

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Three-year contracts must go, CRTC told

Consumer groups urge cellphone changes

By: Steve Rennie

Posted: 02/12/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

GATINEAU, Que. -- Consumer groups and a cellphone industry with starkly opposed views about contracts for handheld devices began to make their cases Monday as the CRTC opened public hearings on a proposed wireless code.

Representatives of three consumer groups urged the regulator to do away with three-year terms in favour of capping contracts at two years.

The Public Interest Advocacy Centre, the Consumers' Association of Canada and Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations of British Columbia also oppose wireless carriers restricting the use of phones to specific countries or network providers.

And they're against companies charging sky-high roaming fees when devices are used outside their normal coverage area.

"Consumers are sick of termination penalties designed to keep them locked into long-term contracts," said John Lawford of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre.

"Consumers are tired of locked handsets. Consumers are often in shock after opening a bill where roaming charges or coverage fees have been applied."

Contract limits are but one of several contentious issues before the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission as it holds a week of hearings in Gatineau, Que., on its proposed wireless code.

The commission aims to set national standards for the content and clarity of cellphone contracts.

In the lead-up to the hearings, the CRTC said it heard a lot of angry comments about three-year contracts offered by wireless carriers when it was putting together a draft version of the national code for wireless services.

So far, the commission hasn't taken up the idea of banning such contracts and has instead dealt with such issues as early-termination fees, allowing the consumer to cancel service at any time.

The federal Competition Bureau said it supports limiting contract length.

The Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association, which lobbies on behalf of the industry, opposes getting rid of three-year contracts.

"If that was really the choice that consumers wanted... someone will provide it in the marketplace," said the group's president and CEO, Bernard Lord, the former premier of New Brunswick.

"The key thing with this code is don't eliminate choice. Don't have the strong arm of government and the regulator come in and say, 'From now on, this is how it's going to be.'

"Make sure the choices are there so consumers who want two-year contracts can get them, if they want three-year contracts they can get them, if they want unlocked phones they can get them. But don't force people to offer it that way."

But consumer groups claim most carriers' two-year plans are not true options. Most three-year plans offer deep discounts on the price of the handheld device. But the groups say two-year plans often charge a lot for the device itself on top of monthly service fees.

On the CRTC's online forum, participants also complained about locked cellphones. The draft code says the carrier must provide the consumer with the means to unlock the device after no more than 30 days of service, at the rate specified in the contract.

No Canadian wireless carrier currently sells unlocked phones.

That's a failing in the market, said CRTC chairman Jean-Pierre Blais: "The market's not working. If nobody's doing it now, that means the market is not working."

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 12, 2013 B3

Factual inaccuracy? Something missing? Help improve our journalism.

Know about news? Share your story suggestions, photos and video.

Spelling error? Punctuation problem? Send us an email if you’ve found a typo.

More Business

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.