18°c Clear
28°c Isolated showers
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Better to stick with cash gifts in your will
David Smith signed a will when he was 75. He had two children and the will gave his cottage to his daughter, who spent a lot of time there, and his house to his son to even things up. That seemed about right to David as the two properties had roughly the same value.
His remaining assets were to be sold and divided equally among his grandchildren. He lived off of his pension and figured that after the house and cottage were gone there would be little left. It would be small nest egg for each of the grandchildren -- a remembrance from their granddad of a few thousand dollars each.
He was well satisfied with what he had done. It was simple. It felt right.
Things went awry however. First, David lost his marbles. There is nothing uncommon about that. Canadians are living longer and longer. The percentage of us who will suffer from dementia of some kind before we die is both significant and growing. Second, his financial affairs were taken over by his sister. He had appointed her in a power of attorney document he signed along with the will. It was her job to take over his finances if he became unable to handle them himself. There is nothing uncommon in that. It was good planning. Without the power of attorney, a court application would have been necessary before someone could take over his affairs.
Third, his sister decided to sell the house. There is nothing uncommon in that either. It was sitting empty. The money from the sale of the house could be nestled away in safe investments. It made no sense to find tenants for the house and rent it out. Being a landlord can be challenging. Tenants have been known to trash the house they rent. His sister concluded cash was safer and easier, and proceeded to sell the house.
What happened when David died? His daughter received the cottage. He still owned it when he died and it was left to her under the will. The son was out of luck -- he was to be given the house under the will, but the house was gone. The money from the house formed part of the "residue" of the estate and the residue went to grandchildren under the terms of the will. The son received nothing.
David did not intend to see his son cut out, but that is what happened. When a gift of a specific item, like a house, is made under a will and the item is not there when the will-maker dies, the gift fails. The heir who was to receive it is out of luck. Most lawyers try to dissuade clients from making wills that divide wealth by distributing items. Instead, they recommend the majority of a person's wealth, including large ticket items like houses, simply form part of the residue of the estate. The residue of the estate is then divided under the will into shares.
If David had followed that advice, his will would have read differently. The will might leave $5,000 to each of his grandchildren, and then divide the residue of the estate into two equal shares, one for his son and one for his daughter. No mention would generally be made of the house or the cottage.
There are several advantages to this type of will. First, it allows for each child to receive a share of the deceased parent's wealth that is exactly equal. It will usually be equal to the penny. That is impossible if one gets the house and the other the cottage. Second, no one, like David's sister, has to worry about selling things. No matter what is sold, whether house, cottage or car, the shares always stay equal and no one, like David's son, gets cut out.
Mr. Smith is real, but facts here have been changed to obscure his identity and that of his family. This is a flaw in many estate plans and one that plays out over and over again, hurting family after family.
John E. S. Poyser is a lawyer with the Wealth and Estate Law Group at the Winnipeg firm Inkster, Christie, Hughes LLP. Contact him at (204) 947-6801 or jpoyser@inksterchristie.ca
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 20, 2010 B5
More Business
- Back to Top
- Return to Business
More Business
(1 of 5 articles for today)
Inside the new W.Va. mine safety lab - fire, flood, roof falls help miners train for disaster
2:16 AM 0
Poll
Most Popular Business
- McMunn & Yates absorbs five McDiarmid locations
- Shark Club opens in citiplace
- Daycare-subsidy rules bad for business
- Magellan signs MOU to produce F-35 tails
- Carriers turned off by Canada's wireless law
- Local business incubator gets new name
- NY, Va. 7-Eleven stores raided as US accuses owners and managers of exploiting immigrants
- Mountain Equipment Co-op unveils new logo, name to appeal to urban customers
- U.S. hedge fund increases its ownership stake in Tim Hortons to 5.5%
- St. Vital Centre's energy savings help managers snag BOMA awards
- Sobeys expanding reach in Western Canada with Safeway acquisition
- McMunn & Yates absorbs five McDiarmid locations
- Shark Club opens in citiplace
- Aircraft maintenance engineer taking off
- Two CBC reporters freed after being detained in Turkey
- St. Vital Centre's energy savings help managers snag BOMA awards
- Toronto condo market poses economic risk to Canada
- Daycare-subsidy rules bad for business
- Fund helps entrepreneurs fly
- New owner for lumber stores
- New owner for lumber stores
- Earls Pembina says goodbye after 18 years
- Sobeys expanding reach in Western Canada with Safeway acquisition
- Grove Pub to take over former home of Papa George's
- New rules let customers cancel phone contracts without penalty after two years
- McMunn & Yates absorbs five McDiarmid locations
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
- Where is easy street? Survey of city's richest routes may surprise
- Custom-made suits no longer just for the ultra-wealthy
- Eateries brace for Blue blitz
- McMunn & Yates absorbs five McDiarmid locations
- Daycare-subsidy rules bad for business
- Warren Buffett -- Winnipeg-style
- Knights riding in with cash to spend
- Transcona transformation
- Target exceeds sales goal at Canadian stores
- The $2-million question
- Accounting merger adds and subtracts
- Bombardier wins German locomotive rail order potentially worth US$2 billion
- Magellan signs MOU to produce F-35 tails
- Sobeys expanding reach in Western Canada with Safeway acquisition
- McMunn & Yates absorbs five McDiarmid locations
- Toronto condo market poses economic risk to Canada
- Cutting edge, made-in-Manitoba tech finds buyer -- in Manitoba
- Google unveils Internet beaming balloons launched into stratosphere
- Warren Buffett -- Winnipeg-style
- Fund helps entrepreneurs fly
- Accounting merger adds and subtracts
- St. Vital Centre's energy savings help managers snag BOMA awards
- Daycare-subsidy rules bad for business
- New owner for lumber stores
- Snowbirds: It's that time of year again
- Sobeys expanding reach in Western Canada with Safeway acquisition
- Custom-made suits no longer just for the ultra-wealthy
- New rules let customers cancel phone contracts without penalty after two years
- Where is easy street? Survey of city's richest routes may surprise
- Value Partners cracks $1-B mark in assets
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
- Manitoba Movers
- Grove Pub to take over former home of Papa George's
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.