15°c Overcast
11°c Cloudy with clear breaks
The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION
Controversy continues over plan to end Saturday mail even after Congress approves 6-day mail
WASHINGTON - The new spending bill passed by Congress on Thursday appears to continue the requirement for six-day mail delivery, but some lawmakers and postal officials say plans to cut Saturday service should proceed.
The financially troubled Postal Service announced last month that it would switch in August to five-day service for first-class mail and continue six-day package delivery. The government at the time was running on a temporary spending measure and postal officials invited lawmakers to spell out the way ahead in the 2013 spending bill. That sweeping funding bill was approved Thursday without new language.
Some lawmakers say a long-standing provision in the bill mandates six-day delivery. Postal authorities argue they still will have delivery over six days, just that not all mail will be delivered all six days.
Meanwhile, the Government Accountability Office weighed in with an opinion that the postal agency did not have the right to unilaterally end Saturday mail.
"We strongly disagree with the GAO's legal opinion," said David Partenheimer, spokesman for the Postal Service. "The critical issue is that the Postal Service is losing $25 million per day under its existing regulatory structure."
The letter carriers union, which has strongly disagreed with the Saturday cutback plan, sided with the GAO.
"We fully expect the Postal Service's board of governors and the postmaster general to follow the law and the expressed will of Congress about maintaining six-day delivery," Fredric Rolando, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, said in a statement. "We do not expect to have a legal fight."
Some lawmakers believe the agency has the responsibility to make the cutback because of it mounting red ink. Among them are Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Rep. Darrell Issa of California. The Republicans sent a letter to the postal board of governors Thursday, telling the governors to stick with their cutback plan.
"Without major, immediate restructuring actions, annual operating deficits will increase, and the Postal Service will sink much deeper into default on payments owed to taxpayers," the letter said.
The Postal Service said it expected to save $2 billion annually with the Saturday cutback. The plan accentuates one of the agency's strong points: Package delivery has increased by 14 per cent since 2010, officials say, while the delivery of letters and other mail has plummeted. Email has decreased the mailing of paper letters, but online purchases have increased package shipping, forcing the Postal Service to adjust to customers' new habits.
The Postal Service lost $1.3 billion in the final three months of last year, following a nearly $16 billion loss the previous fiscal year.
More Business
- Back to Top
- Return to Business
More Business
(1 of 16 articles for today)
Weather still not co-operating as Jersey shore seeks to jump-start 1st summer after Sandy
2:24 PM 0
Poll
Most Popular Business
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
- New owner for lumber stores
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Value Partners cracks $1-B mark in assets
- Balancing today with tomorrow
- Differing dollars
- Creative industries can fuel a city's economic engine
- Latest round in meat war hits the streets
- Netflix eyes subscriber boost
- Six wrong guesses get no respect
- New owner for lumber stores
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
- 2 men arrested in killing of Las Vegas teen who refused to give up his iPad
- New downtown tower could be 42 storeys tall: developers
- Creative industries can fuel a city's economic engine
- Microsoft reveals Xbox One as all-in-1 entertainment console, last of 3 major systems unveiled
- Value Partners cracks $1-B mark in assets
- Skyline-altering project will happen: developer
- Housing slowdown to worsen, cost 150,000 jobs, says mortgage group
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Target opens its first Manitoba stores Tuesday
- New structure to be king of downtown?
- Transcona transformation
- Target opens Manitoba stores
- New owner for lumber stores
- Mounties say crooks passing fake polymer bank notes in British Columbia
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
- City to get a touch of glass
- Canad Inns property has personal meaning for owner
- Holiday pump jump debated
- Manitoba farm land values increased by an average of 4.3 per cent in 2011
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
- Thorough record-keeping key to power of attorney
- Career change seeds
- She's got entrepreneurial spirit
- Value Partners cracks $1-B mark in assets
- Trust me
- Sideways move may be right way up
- New owner for lumber stores
- Value Partners cracks $1-B mark in assets
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Bridging the gap
- Developers to unveil plans for bold downtown tower
- Ex-'Pegger seeks to grow local businesses
- Skyline-altering project will happen: developer
- There are lots of I's in 'team'
- More than a new boss
- New owner for lumber stores
- Transcona transformation
- New structure to be king of downtown?
- CEO, execs terminated at TCIG
- Target opens its first Manitoba stores Tuesday
- Canad Inns property has personal meaning for owner
- Winnipeg's got the REIT stuff
- Value Partners cracks $1-B mark in assets
- Older and jobless? Resource on hand
- MTS to sell Allstream to Egyptian investment group, focus on Manitoba market
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.