Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Generic-drug battle heads to high court

  • Print

OTTAWA -- A long-escalating battle between the Ontario government and two of Canada's major drugstore chains will be fought before the country's top court.

The Supreme Court of Canada issued a ruling on Thursday announcing it would hear a pair of appeals from Shoppers Drug Mart and Rexall owner the Katz Group of Companies. They are fighting to regain the right to sell generic versions of name-brand drugs in the province.

In keeping with standard practice, The Supreme Court justices did not offer reasons for agreeing to hear the cases.

The decision marks the latest turn in a long and complex battle over the fate of lower-priced private-label versions of generic drugs.

The legal wrangling erupted after the province enacted regulations in 2010 that stopped pharmacies from selling their own store-brand versions in place of popular name-brand drugs.

It also outlawed professional allowances generic-drug companies paid to pharmacies in exchange for stocking their products, which pharmacies say cost them $750 million a year.

Shoppers Drug Mart (TSX:SC) and Katz launched legal challenges against the government's decisions and won their first victory in February 2011, when a court ruled the province had no authority to ban pharmacies from selling their private-label drugs.

Less than a year later, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned that decision and ruled in favour of the government.

Shoppers Drug Mart issued a brief statement on Thursday praising the Supreme Court's willingness to hear the appeal.

"The company respects the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada and is pleased with the outcome," it said.

Katz, which owns and operates the Rexall and PharmaPlus chains, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews said the province would continue to fight for the best interests of the province's patients.

"We continue to believe that private-label arrangements do not benefit taxpayers or patients and they are not consistent with our drug reforms," she said in a statement.

The ongoing court battles reflect the cash-strapped Ontario government's efforts to cut health-care costs as it struggles to balance its books. A $16-billion deficit has forced the province to review everything from soaring drug-plan costs to public-sector wages and financial transfers to restrain spending growth.

The initial court ruling in February 2011 said the province went too far with a regulation that barred the sale of private-label generic drugs.

The rule had prevented pharmacies from selling their own lower-priced versions in place of popular name-brand drugs.

However, the appeal judges ruled last December the lower court's analysis was too narrow, adding the government regulations were not too harsh.

"Neither Shoppers nor Katz is precluded from engaging in the purchase or sale of drugs in Ontario as long as they do so in accordance with the legislative and regulatory scheme," said the ruling. "This is regulation; it is not a prohibition."

The court also said it agreed the province could reasonably conclude private-label generics would reduce competitiveness and drive up prices.

Private label, or store brand, generic drugs are identical in formula to other generic and name-brand drugs that are made and sold by big pharmaceutical companies.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 31, 2012 B9

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Chief justices breakdown cameras in courtroom project

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Goslings enjoy Fridays warm weather to soak up some sun and gobble some grass on Heckla Ave in Winnipeg Friday afternoon- See Bryksa’s 30 DAY goose challenge - May 18, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • MIKE APORIUS/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS STANDUP - pretty sunflower in field off HWY 206 near Bird's Hill Park Thursday August 09/2007

View More Gallery Photos


Do you agree with the province’s crackdown on flavoured tobacco products?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google