Business

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Agrium wins support of B.C. Investment Management Corp. in proxy fight

By: Lauren Krugel, The Canadian Press

Posted: 03/15/2013 1:27 PM | Comments: 0 | Last Modified: 03/15/2013 4:23 PM

CALGARY - British Columbia Investment Management Corp. says it's siding with Agrium Inc. (TSX:AGU) in a heated proxy fight with Jana Partners LLC, the activist hedge fund that wants the fertilizer giant to spin off its retail business, among other things.

"After several meetings with Agrium’s management and directors, as well as representatives of Jana Partners and their prospective board nominees, bcIMC has independently concluded that Agrium's current board provides effective oversight," the fund said in a news release.

The Victoria-based fund, which holds about one per cent of Agrium's stock, manages about $98.7 billion in assets globally on behalf of public sector pension plans, public trusts and insurance funds.

Its release comes just weeks before Agrium's April 9 annual general meeting in Calgary, where the contest is likely to be resolved by shareholder vote.

It says it believes the election of five Jana nominees to Agrium's board is not proportionate to the hedge fund's 7.5 per cent ownership position in Agrium.

Doug Pearce, CEO and chief investment officer at bcIMC, said Jana's plan is "not in the best interests of long-term shareholders, such as ourselves."

He adds that bcIMC is "comfortable" with the current board in light of two new additions with agricultural experience: former Viterra CEO Mayo Schmidt and ex-John Deere & Co. executive David Everitt.

The Jana proposal that has garnered the most attention has been to split off Agrium's retail segment, through which seeds and other products are sold to farmers, from its wholesale business. Jana also wants Agrium to cut costs, improve corporate governance and manage capital more effectively.

BcIMC said it likes Agrium in one piece.

"Our analysis shows that there is significant value in Agrium’s integrated business model which bodes well for the company’s long-term prospects," the fund said.

"Agrium has performed very well in relation to its peers and the overall market, and the company has a strong commitment to employee safety and the environment, making it a solid long-term investment."

Jana partner Charles Penner said the hedge fund is "still very confident we have the overall support we need to bring value-unlocking change for all shareholders."

The dissident slate includes Jana managing partner Barry Rosenstein and former Liberal agriculture minister Lyle Vanclief, as well as David Bullock, Stephen Clark and Mitchell Jacobson, who had leadership roles at UAP, Brenntag and MSC, respectively.

Jana says Agrium's board needs more distribution experience.

Agrium has taken aim at what it calls the dissident nominees' "golden leash" arrangement with Jana, whereby the hedge fund would provide special incentive payments to serve on Agrium's board.

Agrium said that raises questions about their independence and commitment to Agrium's long-term performance.

In a letter Friday to fellow investors, the dissident nominees dismissed those claims, saying they're "100 per cent aligned with all shareholders and stand to gain only to the extent that all shareholders gain."

The Jana nominees say those payments are tied entirely to stock performance, like an option.

"It is true that Jana bears this expense, but that is true of every expense in this effort, which has already led to substantial value-creating change for shareholders," they said.

"Despite Agrium's misleading claims, none of us will be bound by any duty other than our fiduciary duty as directors. All of us qualify as independent directors under Canadian securities laws and Agrium's own governance guidelines."

The candidates also say they have collectively invested $14 million of their own money in Agrium.

Agrium has likened Jana's slate to a "Trojan Horse" misleading shareholders into breaking up the company.

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Business

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.