Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Judge delays American Airlines' merger bid over lawsuit

  • Print

NEW YORK -- Lawyers for American Airlines pressed a judge Thursday to approve the company's plan to merge with US Airways and exit bankruptcy protection, but the judge delayed a ruling because of the federal government's lawsuit against the merger.

This was supposed to be American's victory lap -- the day that a judge would remove the last hurdle for a merger that would make American the world's biggest airline.

Instead, it was a sideshow.

The U.S. Justice Department ruined American's plans -- at least temporarily -- on Tuesday by filing a lawsuit against the merger, which it said would hurt competition and increase prices for consumers by leaving four airlines controlling more than 80 per cent of the U.S. air-travel market.

In court Thursday, lawyers for American parent AMR Corp. and its unsecured creditors said the Justice Department's case shouldn't stop the bankruptcy judge from approving AMR's reorganization plan.

But Judge Sean Lane wasn't so sure. He said he had "lingering doubts" about approving the turnaround plan and even considered postponing Thursday's hearing. Instead, he went ahead with the hearing but delayed a decision on AMR's plan until at least Aug. 29.

American and US Airways had hoped to close their merger by late September, but executives for both companies say that is unlikely now. They vowed to fight the Justice Department in court, but that could take months. If the government wins, AMR could be forced to dust off a plan to emerge from bankruptcy as a stand-alone company -- another long process.

The merger was supposed to cap an era of consolidation that has helped the airline industry limit seats, raise prices and return to profitability. Although it would leave one fewer airline, American and US Airways argued their merger would increase competition by creating a stronger rival to industry leaders United Airlines and Delta Air Lines.

Judge Lane also delayed a ruling on a $20-million severance award for AMR CEO Tom Horton, who would serve briefly as chairman before leaving the new company. The U.S. trustee's office, which oversees bankruptcy cases for the Justice Department, said the payment violates bankruptcy-law limits designed to prevent executives from getting big rewards not available to regular employees.

Susan Golden, a lawyer for the trustee, said the new company shouldn't bear the cost of paying Horton for work he did on AMR's reorganization. "He's being paid for work already performed," she said.

But Stephen Karotkin, a lawyer for AMR, said creditors and shareholders approved the merger knowing that it contained Horton's payment. He said the payment in cash and stock would ensure Horton sticks around long enough to help smooth the process of combining two airlines.

 

-- The Associated Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 16, 2013 B12

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Winnipeg Cheapskate: Cheap summer weekends

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Goose sits in high grass near Marion Friday afternoon for cover -See Bryksa 30 Day goose challenge- Day 18 - May 25, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • KEN GIGLIOTTI  WINNIPEG FREE PRESS / July 23 2009 - 090723 - Bart Kives story - Harry Lazarenko Annual River Bank Tour - receding water from summer rains and erosion  damage by flood  and ice  during spring flooding -  Red River , Lyndale Dr. damage to tree roots , river bank damage  , high water marks after 2009 Flood - POY

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should Manitoba support the transport of nuclear waste through the province?

View Results

Ads by Google