Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Madoff pals knew of trouble
New details of Ponzi secrets
NEW YORK -- In December 2008, two of Bernard Madoff's most loyal employees met on a Manhattan street corner and fretted over a closely held secret that the rest of the world would learn about eight days later: their boss was a con man for the ages.
Frank DiPascali told JoAnn Crupi Madoff had just confided his investment firm was out of money and client accounts -- worth billions on paper -- actually had no more value than Monopoly money, authorities say.
The pair then is alleged to have cooked up a cover story that quickly collapsed under the weight of the largest Ponzi scheme in history -- one authorities say cost investors an estimated $17.3 billion.
The exchange was recounted for the first time in a newly rewritten indictment this week expanding the case and charges against five defendants headed for a trial next year.
The indictment brings into sharper focus the final few years of a fraud the government says dated to at least the early 1970s, two decades before Madoff claimed it began and well before 1992, when the government said in its original case against the defendants the conspiracy began.
It portrays a private investment business in Manhattan where as many as a dozen officers grew a fraud so sophisticated that repeated probes by the Securities and Exchange Commission and queries from banks and investors could draw no blood. All the while, it says, they rewarded themselves with millions of dollars, sometimes tax-free or with taxes greatly reduced by fake losses generated by made-up securities trades.
Those facing a criminal trial next year are Annette Bongiorno, 64, Madoff's longtime secretary and a supervisor in his private investment business; Daniel Bonventre, 65, his director of operations for investments; Crupi, 51, who managed accounts; and two computer programmers, Jerome O'Hara, 49, and George Perez, 46. All have pleaded not guilty.
Besides the 74-year-old Madoff, who is serving a 150-year prison sentence, six others have pleaded guilty in the case, including a brother who served as his chief compliance officer; former finance chief DiPascali; a payroll manager; an accountant; a comptroller; and a securities trader.
The new account fills in information prosecutors learned as they built their case with help from several co-operators, including DiPascali.
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said when the new indictment was released earlier this week that with the new charges, "the architecture of Madoff's house of cards and each defendant's alleged role in it becomes clearer."
Mary Galligan, the head of the FBI's New York office, said the government has known for years the Ponzi scheme was not the work only of Madoff, who pleaded guilty to fraud and insisted he acted alone.
"Each of the defendants in his or her way allegedly played a key role in designing, building or maintaining the house of cards. The habitual doctoring of books and records, the fictitious trades, the phantom accounts, were the core of the charade," she said.
Eric Breslin, a lawyer for Crupi, said his client's conversation with DiPascali was important evidence because it shows DiPascali didn't tell her about the fraud until days before Madoff revealed it his sons and he was arrested.
Attorney Gordon Mehler, who represents O'Hara, said: "Nearly four years have passed since Madoff confessed, and the indictment against the five Madoff employees has now expanded to more than 150 pages. But neither the passage of time nor the extreme length of the indictment has weakened Jerry O'Hara's resolve to fight the charges against him."
Larry H. Krantz, attorney for Perez, said: "We will be vigorously defending against the charges."
Other lawyers did not respond to messages seeking comment.
As the government tells it, the fraud appears to have started in a measured way in the 1970s as phoney documents were regularly manufactured to make it appear investor funds were being invested. Lists of bogus trades of securities were based on data gleaned from published sources of market information.
By the 1990s, according to the indictment, Madoff leaned on his back-office workers to produce and mail thousands of pages of statements to customers of his "split-strike conversion strategy," an investing technique based on a model basket of S&P 100 stocks that he claimed was unique. Prosecutors say no trades occurred.
All the while, Madoff was telling investors they were making up to 45 per cent in annual gains.
-- The Associated Press
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 6, 2012 B17
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Business
- Back to Top
- Return to Business
More Business
(1 of 50 articles for this week)
Price of oil falls below $96 per barrel as traders await data, Fed chief Bernanke's speech
12:29 AM 0BANGKOK - The price of oil fell Monday ahead of the release later this week of economic data from the ...
Poll
Most Popular Business
- 2 men arrested in killing of Las Vegas teen who refused to give up his iPad
- Chinese court sentences entrepreneur to death in latest crackdown on underground banking
- Ex-'Pegger seeks to grow local businesses
- Hundreds of tons of New Zealand meat stranded at Chinese ports over certification dispute
- Veteran newspaper editor Neil Reynolds dead at age 72
- Bangladesh High Court bars garment factory owner from leaving country
- Toronto, Wall Street surge higher amid positive U.S. data, consumer sentiment
- Buyer beware in online auto sales: experts
- Target opens Manitoba stores
- Bridging the gap
- Transcona transformation
- Mounties say crooks passing fake polymer bank notes in British Columbia
- Holiday pump jump debated
- Driving downtown development
- Winnipeg's got the REIT stuff
- McDonald's adding 3 new Quarter Pounders as it phases out third-pound Angus burgers
- 2 men arrested in killing of Las Vegas teen who refused to give up his iPad
- 3 Ford owners sue in federal court, saying EcoBoost engine is defective
- Emergency manager reveals Detroit is nearly broke; city may have no choice except bankruptcy
- Lakeview pumped about Hecla resort
- Target opens its first Manitoba stores Tuesday
- New structure to be king of downtown?
- Transcona transformation
- Target opens Manitoba stores
- Mounties say crooks passing fake polymer bank notes in British Columbia
- Raising the rent is a good sign
- City to get a touch of glass
- Canad Inns property has personal meaning for owner
- Holiday pump jump debated
- Border-fee idea doesn't fly
- Viterra plans $20 million capacity upgrade at four Saskatchewan grain terminals
- Ex-'Pegger seeks to grow local businesses
- Rent to own
- Transcona transformation
- Bridging the gap
- A fix for hockey sticks
- Condos made from shipping containers pass hurdle at city hall
- Monsanto wins Supreme Court fight over its genetically engineered soybeans
- Idaho spud giant bets on biotech potatoes 12 years after similar Monsanto push failed
- Investing lessons from the golf links
- Transcona transformation
- Winnipeg's got the REIT stuff
- CEO, execs terminated at TCIG
- Diversification spurs Exchange Income's growth
- Driving downtown development
- Late deal in workplace sex-harassment case
- There are lots of I's in 'team'
- Bridging the gap
- Ex-'Pegger seeks to grow local businesses
- Viterra plans $20 million capacity upgrade at four Saskatchewan grain terminals
- Transcona transformation
- New structure to be king of downtown?
- CEO, execs terminated at TCIG
- Target opens its first Manitoba stores Tuesday
- Canad Inns property has personal meaning for owner
- Winnipeg's got the REIT stuff
- Older and jobless? Resource on hand
- MacDon on the block?
- Winnipeg Boeing plant set to expand
- Local boy leads Great-West
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.