11°c A few clouds
18°c Sunny
The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION
Maryland high court overturns jury award in Exxon case, new trial ordered
Maryland's highest court has overturned jury verdicts that ordered Exxon Mobil Corp. to pay more than $1.5 billion in damages from a 2006 leak at a gasoline station that polluted a community's drinking water.
In two rulings issued Tuesday, the Court of Appeals of Maryland also ordered new trials in the cases related to the spill. In the larger of the two cases involving approximately 150 families and businesses, a jury in 2011 awarded $1 billion in punitive damages and $495 million in compensatory damages after a trial that lasted months. Seven judges sitting on the court overruled the punitive damages, saying they could only be awarded if the plaintiffs proved Exxon had intended to act wrongfully.
The judges said that the Irving, Texas-based company could have done a better job communicating with residents during cleanup from the spill. But the court said plaintiffs didn't show clear and convincing evidence that Exxon intended to mislead anyone or that they were harmed by relying on any statements the company made.
In addition, the court overturned awards the jury handed out for emotional distress and awards related to property values. The court said some residents were awarded money for emotional distress but didn't provide evidence their wells were contaminated. A few had contaminated wells but didn't show any injury linked to contaminated water. Some residents were improperly awarded money based on the fear that their property values would decline. Others got awards even though wells on their property were not found to be contaminated.
The court also overturned jury awards in a case that involved about 90 households. The jury had awarded approximately $150 million in damages in that case.
Exxon said in a statement it was reviewing the court's decision but that the company had "acted appropriately after the accident and the court has agreed."
"We have apologized to the Jacksonville community and we remain ready to compensate those who were truly damaged by this unfortunate accident. We will continue the cleanup," the statement said.
Attorneys for both groups of plaintiffs did not immediately return telephone messages left Wednesday.
Both cases stem from a leak at an Exxon station in the community of Jacksonville, a small, affluent community about 20 miles north of Baltimore. An Exxon contractor doing work at the station punctured a gasoline feed line and the leak was not properly repaired. That allowed more 26,000 gallons of fuel to pour into the ground over more than a month. Many residents in the area get their water from wells, and the spill led the state to order well monitoring in the area.
___
Follow Jessica Gresko at http://twitter.com/jessicagresko
More Business
- Back to Top
- Return to Business
Poll
Most Popular Business
- New owner for lumber stores
- Housing slowdown to worsen, cost 150,000 jobs, says mortgage group
- Creative industries can fuel a city's economic engine
- Emerging economies seen as key
- Pollard Banknote signs ticket deal with Western Canada Lottery Corp.
- Microsoft reveals Xbox One as all-in-1 entertainment console, last of 3 major systems unveiled
- Temple Hotels buys hotel in Sherwood Park, Alta., for $15.15 million
- Manitoba Movers
- Developers to unveil plans for bold downtown tower
- Paying bills and consumer consumption hurting Canadians' ability to save: study
- Mounties say crooks passing fake polymer bank notes in British Columbia
- Holiday pump jump debated
- 2 men arrested in killing of Las Vegas teen who refused to give up his iPad
- New owner for lumber stores
- Microsoft reveals Xbox One as all-in-1 entertainment console, last of 3 major systems unveiled
- Creative industries can fuel a city's economic engine
- Bridging the gap
- Apple uses companies outside US to avoid paying billions in taxes, Senate inquiry finds
- Chinese court sentences entrepreneur to death in latest crackdown on underground banking
- Ex-'Pegger seeks to grow local businesses
- Target opens its first Manitoba stores Tuesday
- New structure to be king of downtown?
- Transcona transformation
- Target opens Manitoba stores
- Mounties say crooks passing fake polymer bank notes in British Columbia
- City to get a touch of glass
- Canad Inns property has personal meaning for owner
- Holiday pump jump debated
- Border-fee idea doesn't fly
- Local boy leads Great-West
- New owner for lumber stores
- Developers to unveil plans for bold downtown tower
- Bridging the gap
- Boreal Forest conservation negotiations end in failure after three years
- Portage, Winnipeg law firms join forces
- Canadian telecom company Telus signs deal to buy Mobilicity for $373 million
- Manitoba Movers
- Creative industries can fuel a city's economic engine
- Biden says Jewish leaders in Hollywood, social media drove changing attitudes on gay marriage
- Arizona restaurant becomes poster child for dark side of online customer reviews
- New owner for lumber stores
- Ex-'Pegger seeks to grow local businesses
- Developers to unveil plans for bold downtown tower
- Bridging the gap
- Late deal in workplace sex-harassment case
- Diversification spurs Exchange Income's growth
- More than a new boss
- There are lots of I's in 'team'
- Viterra plans $20 million capacity upgrade at four Saskatchewan grain terminals
- Creative industries can fuel a city's economic engine
- Transcona transformation
- New owner for lumber stores
- New structure to be king of downtown?
- CEO, execs terminated at TCIG
- Target opens its first Manitoba stores Tuesday
- Canad Inns property has personal meaning for owner
- Winnipeg's got the REIT stuff
- Older and jobless? Resource on hand
- Winnipeg Boeing plant set to expand
- Local boy leads Great-West
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.