Business

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Peabody Energy says US regulators investigating power-plant project

By: Jim Suhr, The Associated Press

Posted: 02/26/2013 3:02 PM | Comments: 0

ST. LOUIS - Federal security regulators are investigating Peabody Energy Corp.'s role in development of the largest coal-fueled power plant built in the U.S. in the past three decades, the company disclosed in its latest annual report.

St. Louis-based Peabody, the world's biggest private-sector coal producer, said the Securities and Exchange Commission served the company with a subpoena last month requesting information and documents related to the fledgling Prairie State project.

Peabody, in the filing Monday, did not elaborate. It said only that it was co-operating and "believes that such other pending or threatened proceedings are likely to be resolved without a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows."

Peabody spokesman Vic Svec said in an emailed statement Tuesday that "we look forward to sharing information on what is a highly successful project."

SEC spokeswoman Christina D'Amico declined to publicly discuss the matter, citing the agency's policy on those investigations.

The Prairie State Energy Campus in Illinois' Washington County, located southeast of St. Louis, includes a 1,600-megawatt electricity generating plant and an adjacent coal mine. Its two electricity generators went online last year.

The project began more than a decade ago, but it was dogged by construction snags and escalating costs. Peabody owns roughly 5 per cent of the campus, which the company developed with a consortium of other public power co-operatives in various states. The plant now serves 2.5 million households from Missouri to West Virginia.

Before construction began in October 2007, then-Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich called the effort the biggest private capital project ever planned for southern Illinois and hailed it as a milestone in helping revive Illinois' ailing coal fields, which in previous decades were overlooked in favour of cleaner burning Western coal.

Environmental and public health groups have argued that the plant would pose a health risk and diminish visibility in southeast Missouri's Mingo National Wildlife Refuge by releasing sulfur dioxide, mercury and other pollutants.

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Business

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.