A few clouds

Winnipeg, MB

-10°c A few clouds

Full Forecast

Business

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Judge clears way for public offering in Empire State Building

Posted: 05/6/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

Advertisement

  • Print

NEW YORK -- A Manhattan judge last week backed a $55-million settlement in a court battle over the Empire State Building, effectively clearing the way for a plan to let the public buy shares in the famous New York City landmark.

Judge O. Peter Sherwood told lawyers at a court hearing he would formally approve the settlement in the coming days with a written ruling.

"I'm satisfied that the settlement reached is fair," Sherwood said.

The settlement stems from a long-running dispute over plans by real estate magnates Peter Malkin and his son, Anthony, to offer the public shares in their holdings in Manhattan and Connecticut, including the iconic 102-storey skyscraper. The offering is expected to raise $1 billion for a new company called Empire State Trust Inc.

A lawsuit alleged the building's owners misled non-controlling investors about the proposal to sell the public shares in a new company that would own the building -- an accusation the defendants denied.

The plaintiffs also had claimed the initial public offering would place an unfair tax burden on them. Along with creating a $55-million settlement fund, the deal will allow the investors to defer taxes on capital gains. Both sides had reached a tentative settlement late last year. But final approval was held up by the objections of a small group of investors who still oppose the IPO.

There was no immediate response last week to a message left with a lawyer for the opponents.

Some of the country's marquee buildings, including the General Motors building in New York and the Embarcadero Center in San Francisco, are owned by publicly traded companies. But the IPO for the Empire State Building is viewed as a rare chance for investors to own a piece of history -- an Art Deco icon visited by millions of tourists each year and featured in films such as King Kong and Sleepless in Seattle.

When the Empire State Building changed hands in 1961, the buyers sold 1,100 shares at $10,000 per share to help finance the deal. Some of the 3,300 investors were ordinary New Yorkers who pulled together just enough cash to buy partial shares.

Earlier this week, Sherwood rejected a challenge by the handful of holdouts to the IPO who argued a decades-old provision -- one that that would allow the Malkins to buy them out for $100 a share if they voted against the plan -- was against the law. The proposed public offering values the shares at more than $300,000 each.

 

-- The Associated Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 6, 2013 B4

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.