Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 9/6/2014 (721 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
WASHINGTON -- A Washington think-tank has estimated the likely annual cost of cybercrime and economic espionage to the world economy at more than $445 billion -- or almost one per cent of global income.
The estimate by the Center for Strategic and International Studies is lower than the eye-popping $1-trillion figure cited by U.S. President Barack Obama, but it nonetheless puts cybercrime in the ranks of drug trafficking in terms of worldwide economic harm.
"This is a global problem and we aren't doing enough to manage risk," said James Lewis, CSIS senior fellow and co-author of the report, released Monday.
The report, funded by the security firm McAfee, which is part of Intel Security, represents one of the first efforts to analyze the costs, drawing on a variety of data.
"Cybercrime costs are big, and they're growing," said Stewart Baker, a former Department of Homeland Security policy official and a co-author of the report. "The more that governments understand what those costs are, the more likely they are to bring their laws and policies into line with preventing those sorts of losses."
The most advanced economies suffered the greatest losses, the report stated. The United States, Germany and China together accounted for roughly $200 billion of the total in 2013. Much of that was due to theft of intellectual property by foreign governments.
Though the report does not break out a figure for that, or name countries behind such theft, the U.S. government has publicly named China as the major perpetrator of cyber economic espionage against the United States.
The Chinese government has accused the United States of being one of the biggest perpetrators of cyber-espionage, but the U.S. government has always objected that it does not steal intellectual property and hand it to its own industries to give them a competitive advantage.
CSIS and McAfee estimated the United States lost about $100 billion. Germany was second with $60 billion, and China followed with $45 billion.
In both the United States and China, the losses represent about 0.6 per cent of their economies, while Germany's loss is 1.6 per cent.
Japan, the world's fourth-largest economy, reported losses of $1 billion, which researchers felt was extremely low and not credible.
Canada's losses were pegged at 0.17 per cent of GDP.
Valuing intellectual property is an art form, based on estimating future revenues the intellectual property will produce or the value the market places on it, the report said. Putting a price tag on it is difficult but not impossible, it said.
Intellectual-property theft lessens companies' abilities to gain a full return on their inventions, and so they turn to other activities to make a profit, the report states. That depresses overall global rates of innovation, it said.
The report stated that countries appear to tolerate cybercrime losses as long as they stay at less than two per cent of their national income. If losses rise above two per cent, "we assume it would prompt much stronger calls for action as companies and societies find the burden unacceptable," it said.
The report breaks the harm into three categories, without giving figures. The largest, it said, is intellectual property theft. The second is financial crime, or the theft of credit card and other types of data largely by criminal rings. The third is theft of confidential business information to gain an advantage in commercial negotiations or business deals.
CSIS used several methods to arrive at a range of estimates, from $375 billion to as much as $575 billion. Researchers looked for published data from governments around the world. They interviewed officials in 17 major countries. And they came up with a predictive model based on a CSIS report last year that estimated the cost of cybercrime to the U.S. economy. Their figures also included the cost of recovering from cyberattacks.
The main assumption they used was the cost of cybercrime is a constant share of national income -- at least in countries with similar levels of development.
-- Washington Post