Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Agency hit for retaining too much info

  • Print

OTTAWA -- Canada's anti-money-laundering agency continues to keep too much personal information about people, the federal privacy watchdog says.

In a newly released audit report, privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart said the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre has made limited progress in addressing the problem since she flagged it four years ago.

The centre, known as FinTRAC, zeros in on cash linked to money laundering, terrorism and other crimes by sifting through data from police, intelligence officers, banks, insurance companies, securities dealers, money service businesses, real estate brokers, casinos and others.

Institutions must report large cash transactions or electronic fund transfers of $10,000 or more, as well as any transactions where there are reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorist financing.

Stoddart found in 2009 that although reports about allegedly dubious transactions were reviewed and prioritized, they were not assessed for reasonable suspicion of illicit money movement.

The privacy commissioner said Thursday she is disappointed in the latest results.

FinTRAC spokesman Darren Gibb said the agency is acting on Stoddart's findings and he stressed any sensitive information the organization has collected is not being misused.

"I don't want to minimize concerns that she's raised, because we're moving to address those concerns," he said. "But Canadians need to be reassured that the information they provide us will be protected, and that is our No. 1 priority."

As of March 2012, FinTRAC's databases held approximately 165 million reports containing personal information related to transactions such as house down payments, car purchases and wire transfers sent by parents to children studying abroad, the audit says.

Stoddart uncovered a number of reports that did not meet the $10,000 reporting threshold, along with examples that didn't clearly spell out reasonable grounds for suspicion.

In one case, a financial institution filed a report when a storekeeper deposited $570 in $100, $50, $20 and $5 bills, but it did not indicate why the transaction was considered suspicious.

"Given the examples we found, I have serious concerns about the extent to which FinTRAC's information holdings are populated with personal information that should never have even been submitted," Stoddart said in a news release.

The audit report found the anti-money-laundering agency had made some advances on privacy issues, including improved security-awareness initiatives.

But it found unsatisfactory progress on other fronts.

Among other things, Stoddart recommends the agency analyze and assess incoming reports and identify and toss out information it should not have received.

The agency accepted all recommendations and provided responses as to how it intends to address them, Stoddart acknowledged in the release.

"FinTRAC has proposed some measures to address the deficiencies we identified," she said. "However, there is more work to do. It still needs effective screening processes to ensure it no longer receives and retains sensitive personal information that it doesn't need."

Stoddart says she plans to follow up with the agency in two years to gauge progress.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 25, 2013 A16

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


NDP MLAs pitch their ‘Pledge of Solidarity’ in attempt to heal caucus

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A water lily in full bloom is reflected in the pond at the Leo Mol Sculpture Garden Tuesday afternoon. Standup photo. Sept 11,  2012 (Ruth Bonneville/Winnipeg Free Press)
  • A monarch butterfly looks for nectar in Mexican sunflowers at Winnipeg's Assiniboine Park Monday afternoon-Monarch butterflys start their annual migration usually in late August with the first sign of frost- Standup photo– August 22, 2011   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos


Should NDP MLAs sign the "pledge of solidarity"?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google