Canada

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Ambrose's shocker all about 'awareness'

Status of women minister who voted pro-life blasted

By: Steve Rennie

Posted: 09/28/2012 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

Public Works and Government Services Minister Rona Ambrose was on the offensive in question period. (ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Related Items

Polls
- Should Parliament appoint a committee to study the legal definition of a human being?

OTTAWA -- Facing calls for her job and accused by the NDP of betraying the women she represents at the federal cabinet table, a defiant Rona Ambrose stood in the House of Commons to explain why she voted in support of a pro-life motion.

Sort of.

Asked why she was one of 10 Conservative cabinet ministers who supported backbench MP Stephen Woodworth's motion to strike a committee to examine the definition of a human being, Ambrose responded by extolling the Conservative government's record on funding projects for women and girls.

"It is interesting that this is the first question that I have received on the status of women file this year. In fact, I think this is the first question I have received since last year as well," Ambrose said during question period.

"Do you know why that is, Mr. Speaker? It is because this government has an incredible track record of standing up for Canadian women and girls. We have increased the funding to the status of women to its highest point in Canadian history."

The government has funded more than 500 projects to tackle violence against women and empower women and girls, she added.

Ambrose, the minister responsible for the status of women, stunned observers Wednesday when she rose to her feet in favour of Woodworth's motion -- despite the fact Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said he has no plans to reopen the abortion debate in Canada.

Though the motion was defeated 203 to 91, a tweet from Ambrose following the vote suggested it was a way to raise awareness about discrimination against girls through "sex selection abortion."

"I have repeatedly raised concerns about discrimination of girls by sex selection abortion: no law needed, but we need awareness!" she wrote.

Ambrose's spokeswoman, Amber Irwin, said the minister was not available for an interview this week.

The minister has come under fire from critics both inside the House of Commons and beyond, including women's rights groups who are calling for her resignation.

New Democrat MP Libby Davies called Ambrose's vote "very shocking." Davies said the minister's decision showed she was not prepared to uphold the rights of women in Canada.

"This motion was clearly about undermining women's equality, reproductive rights. That's been very clear from Day 1 and I think that's how the vote was taken," Davies said.

"So I think she can rationalize it all she wants, but as the (minister for the) status of women, she clearly betrayed the women of this country by not standing up and ensuring that we don't let the clock be turned backwards. So I think it was disappointing, I was -- I was really surprised when I saw her vote for the motion. I don't buy her argument at all."

Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae said he was "personally surprised" to see Ambrose stand in support of the motion.

"It's not an issue I've ever discussed with the minister. But I think everybody has to sort of understand that, you know, these are private member's motions and individuals will have different views and explanations for their vote," he said.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 28, 2012 A19

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Canada

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.