Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Bill to keep mentally ill in custody longer blasted

  • Print

OTTAWA -- The federal government is trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist with legislation to make it easier to keep mentally ill offenders in custody for longer, an alliance of mental-health experts said Tuesday.

The alliance represents nine national mental-health organizations, none of which was consulted when the government put together Bill C-54, said Dr. Paul Federoff, president of the Canadian Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

Bill C-54, the Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act, was introduced in February by Justice Minister Rob Nicholson. It came out of a review Nicholson ordered of current laws just two days after a psychiatrist recommended Vince Li be allowed 30-minute escorted walks away from the Selkirk Mental Health Centre.

Li was found not criminally responsible (NRC) in 2008 for the murder of 22-year-old Tim McLean. The grisly killing on a Greyhound bus bound for Winnipeg made international headlines. Li was suffering from schizophrenia.

The bill would affect someone like Li by giving the court the ability to designate as high risk certain NCR offenders whose crimes were particularly brutal and threaten public safety. It can be applied retroactively to NCR offenders still receiving treatment.

However, Chris Summerville, executive director of the Manitoba Schizophrenia Society and CEO of the Schizophrenia Society of Canada, said tying punishment or a designation as high risk to the brutality of the crime belies evidence that shows there is no correlation between the seriousness of a crime and the likelihood a NCR offender will reoffend or cannot be treated.

"We understand the need to protect Canadians from individuals that commit violent crimes, however this bill as currently written will not do this," said Summerville. "What this bill has done is tell Canadians they should be afraid of people living with mental illness."

Federoff said this bill will not prevent crime, but may make it more likely mentally ill people avoid treatment or choose to go to jail where the sentence might be shorter than the open-ended incarceration they might get for being designated NCR. He said existing laws for NCR offenders are closer "to the ideal."

Currently, when an offender is given a designation as NCR, they are sent to a mental-health treatment facility. Their care is overseen by a provincial review board that reviews progress and makes periodic rulings to gradually increase privileges with a view to slowly reintegrating offenders into the community.

The review board could ultimately recommend the offender be released under certain conditions, including requiring them to take their medication and continue seeing psychologists and psychiatrists.

Federoff said to restrict the abilities of the review board and give more power to the court is the wrong way to go and sends a message to the public to be afraid.

Various studies suggest mentally ill offenders who receive proper treatment are far less likely to reoffend than those who serve time in prison, said Summerville. One study in Ontario about a decade ago showed the recidivism rate for NCR offenders was 7.5 per cent compared to 45 per cent for offenders who served time in federal prison.

"This tells us the current review-board system works," he said. The group is not against all of the provisions in C-54, saying those that ensure victims are informed if an offender is released, and giving review boards power to order offenders to have no contact with victims, are helpful to victims.

Julie Di Mambro, a spokeswoman for Nicholson, said Tuesday the changes to the law were made at the request of victims' families and provincial governments.

mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 8, 2013 A10

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Gary Lawless & Ed Tait try not to bleeping cry over the woesome Jets

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • KEN GIGLIOTTI  WINNIPEG FREE PRESS / July 23 2009 - 090723 - Bart Kives story - Harry Lazarenko Annual River Bank Tour - receding water from summer rains and erosion  damage by flood  and ice  during spring flooding -  Red River , Lyndale Dr. damage to tree roots , river bank damage  , high water marks after 2009 Flood - POY
  • PHIL.HOSSACK@FREEPRESS.MB.CA 100527-Winnipeg Free Press THe Provencher Foot Bridge is lit up

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Are you in favour of the Harper government's new 'family tax cut'?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google