Light snow

Winnipeg, MB

-11°c Light snow

Full Forecast

Canada

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Cable suggests Harper lied about Afghan pullout

NATO, PM eyed training mission in 2010

Posted: 05/13/2011 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

Advertisement

  • Print

OTTAWA -- Prime Minister Stephen Harper secretly promised NATO early last year that Canada would consider staying in Afghanistan to conduct army training, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable.

It was an assurance the Conservative government kept under wraps for months until the new mission was announced -- much to the surprise of the public and opposition parties -- last November.

The government line almost right up to the training mission announcement was that the combat mission would end and the troops were coming home.

The army is now set to deploy up to 950 troops and support staff to bases in Kabul, Marzar-e-Sharif and Herat.

NATO's secretary general pressed Harper and Defence Minister Peter MacKay in a series of meetings in Ottawa in January 2010 to join its newly established training mission in Kabul.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen "sought Canadian commitment to a post-2011 role in training Afghan security forces as part of the NATO Training Mission in Afghanistan," said a cable released by WikiLeaks on Thursday.

The Jan. 20, 2010, summary of the discussion from the U.S. embassy in Ottawa noted that "Harper promised that the government would look at the possibility."

Rasmussen, in his first visit to Ottawa as secretary general, assured his hosts he was not there to "cause problems" and respected that Parliament had mandated ending the combat mission in 2011.

The document suggests Harper was worried the impending Canadian departure would be characterized as a "withdrawal" and that the optics surrounding the mission needed to managed.

Harper noted that the Obama administration's plan to begin pulling U.S. troops out of Afghanistan was "not helpful politically to his government" because it would make the case for staying a more difficult sell to the Canadian public.

Rasmussen told the prime minister he was worried the Canadian withdrawal in 2011 could produce a "domino effect," and increase domestic pressure on Germany and France to leave as well.But Harper rejected the comparison and insisted Canada has "been there in a big way".

Harper told the NATO chief that he saw three downsides to a continuing presence in Afghanistan, including the high number of combat deaths, which was "the most damaging" aspect.

The cable is startling because it suggests that the final decision to embark on a training mission was something long under consideration in the Prime Minister's Office but not shared over the wider government.

New Democrat Jack Harris accused Harper of not being straight with the Canadian public.

"The public obviously had no indication this was coming until they actually made the announcement," he said. "Whether it's totally duplicitous or not, I'm not sure, but it is saying one thing in public and another in private."

-------- The Canadian Press

U.S. chides PM's Arctic rhetoric

A new Wikileaks cable suggests the U.S. government views Stephen Harper's talk about Canadian Arctic sovereignty as little more than rhetoric designed to win votes.

In a diplomatic cable Wikileaks posted this week, the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa says the Tories have made successful political use of promises to beef up Canada's presence in the Arctic.

"The persistent high public profile which this government has accorded 'Northern Issues' and the Arctic is, however, unprecedented and reflects the PM's views that 'the North has never been more important to our country' -- although one could perhaps paraphrase to state 'the North has never been more important to our Party.'," the cable quoted U.S Ambassador David Jacobsen.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 13, 2011 A18

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.