Canada

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Canada 55th on info release

Harper government rejects report in memo withheld for five months

By: Dean Beeby

Posted: 02/25/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press Archives Information commissioner Suzanne Legault: centre�s analysis �a really useful tool.� (CP)

OTTAWA -- The Harper government is dismissing a report that ranks it 55th in the world for upholding freedom of information, saying it has a sterling record for openness.

But a four-page document outlining the federal rebuttal took five months to release after a request under the Access to Information Act -- underscoring the very delay problem that contributed to Canada's dismal ranking.

A human-rights group based in Halifax has issued three report cards since 2011 on Canada's anemic standing in the world with regard to so-called right-to-know legislation.

The Centre for Law and Democracy used a 61-point tool to measure Canada's legislation against that of other countries, in co-operation with Madrid-based Access Info Europe.

Canada's standing in September 2011 was 40th of 89 countries, fell to 51st in June last year, then to 55th of 93 countries last September, behind Mongolia and Colombia.

"While standards around the world have advanced, Canada's access laws have stagnated and sometimes even regressed," the centre concluded, noting Canada was a world leader in 1983 when its federal information law came into force.

The research won praise from Canada's information commissioner, Suzanne Legault, who said "the analysis that this group has done is going to be a really useful tool" in her own investigation of freedom-of-information issues.

But an internal memo last summer to Treasury Board President Tony Clement cites the report's "weaknesses," saying the methodology "does not allow for an accurate comparison of the openness of a society and of its government."

The memo from Michelle d'Auray, then secretary of the Treasury Board, which oversees the access-to-information system, noted the report did not take into account the government's proactive disclosure of information, the 2006 expansion of the act to cover some 250 additional entities such as Crown corporations, or years of court rulings that reinforce citizens' right to information.

The internal memo was among a group of records requested from Treasury Board last September by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

The law requires a response within 30 days, but the agency gave itself a 120-day extension -- four additional months -- so it could consult the Privy Council Office, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's department.

The report card from the Centre for Law and Democracy found such unilateral, lengthy extensions are invoked too often by federal departments, calling delay a "classical way of effectively denying requests."

"Public authorities should be limited to one extension of no more than 30 days, applicable only in appropriate cases," the centre said in a key recommendation for reform.

In December last year, Clement released 2011-2012 statistics on the operation of the Access to Information Act, saying the numbers helped demonstrate "our government is the most transparent government in Canadian history."

But Legault, referring to the same statistics, said too many departments were granting themselves generous time extensions for responses, among other problems.

The Centre for Law and Democracy responded to Treasury Board's critique of its methodology, in particular to the claim the Harper government's proactive disclosure of some information should have earned points.

"Although proactive disclosure is important, it does not guarantee access to categories of sensitive information -- such as information which could expose significant malfeasance or which is embarrassing for government -- which are essential to real public accountability," says a note provided to The Canadian Press by Michael Karanicolas and Toby Mendel.

The note adds that even were the government's critiques "correct, which they are not, (they) would alter Canada's score by only a couple of points."

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 25, 2013 A8

Factual inaccuracy? Something missing? Help improve our journalism.

Know about news? Share your story suggestions, photos and video.

Spelling error? Punctuation problem? Send us an email if you’ve found a typo.

More Canada

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.