Canada

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Canadians still in combat in Kandahar

Ottawa approves exemption for those serving with allies

By: Murray Brewster

Posted: 10/15/2012 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

OTTAWA -- National Defence successfully pushed the Harper government last year to ease the prohibition on Canadian troops from setting foot in Kandahar and participating in combat operations by establishing an exemption for those serving with allies, internal documents reveal.

It is a decision that violates both the spirit and the letter of the Parliament motion that led to the country's exit from the Afghan war, the opposition charged.

Less than six Canadians, most of them with the air force, continue to serve in the volatile region that has been the epicentre of the Taliban insurgency.

The much-heralded end to Canada's five-year guerrilla war in southern Afghanistan produced the iron-clad policy that barred soldiers from taking part in combat operations and being anywhere near war-torn Kandahar province after Dec. 31, 2011.

The date was established in the Parliament motion of 2008.

Even though Canada didn't participate in the U.S.-led Iraq war, the previous Liberal government quietly allowed Canadian officers, including the country's soon-to-be retiring top soldier Gen. Walt Natynczyk, to serve on secondment in that war.

In contrast, the original Conservative government dictate over Kandahar was much stricter, perhaps as a reflection of the politically radioactive nature of the issue.

The Privy Council Office was asked in the spring of 2011 to approve an exemption for soldiers "working in exchange positions with allied nations," said a recently released briefing note prepared for the head of the army on March 22, 2011.

The note was obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

The measure was supported by Defence Minister Peter MacKay.

A spokeswoman for National Defence says the dispensation was granted.

Canadian Forces "members serving as fully integrated members of foreign forces in exchange positions are permitted to be in Kandahar province and to serve in combat roles, as their host units direct them," Lauri Sullivan said in an email.

Since the exemption was granted, at least four Canadians have served in volatile province, two of them with the Royal Australian Air Force, one with the Royal Air Force and one with the U.S. Army.

NDP defence critic Jack Harris said it shouldn't be permitted and the fact the soldiers and air crew are on a secondment doesn't make any difference.

"I believe it's contrary to the Parliamentary motion," Harris said. "It is a decision of this country that they're not going to participate, and their participation in the combat mission in Afghanistan is ended. That means no Canadian troops."

As the war was winding down and prior to the training mission in Kabul, Prime Minister Stephen Harper was quoted as saying only a few soldiers would be left in Afghanistan to guard the embassy.

Harris said "people accepted that word at the time" and were let down with the training mission, and now see the exemption.

"This belies whether the prime minister and the government is prepared to stand behind their word," he said.

The military says officers involved in the exchange program gain valuable field experience and usually it is the host nation that extends the invitation.

Each case is evaluated individually by National Defence headquarters staff "to ensure the mission is in keeping with Canadian values, directions and policies," said Sullivan's email note.

The final decision rests the vice chief of defence staff who will sign off on the deployment.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 15, 2012 A8

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Canada

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.