Canada

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Federal government says it may retaliate over new U.S. meat labelling plan

By: The Canadian Press

Posted: 03/8/2013 6:09 PM | Comments: 0 | Last Modified: 03/8/2013 6:52 PM

The Canadian government is warning Washington it may retaliate if the U.S. brings in a new, more restrictive trade rule on how beef and pork product exports are labelled.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposal announced Friday calls for foreign producers to list on the package of meat products where the animal was born, raised and slaughtered, as well as other packaging restrictions.

"The proposed changes will increase the discrimination against exports of cattle and hogs from Canada and increase damages to Canadian industry," Canada's Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz said in a news release from Ottawa.

The U.S. said the new rule would help it comply with a World Trade Organization decision last year that found its country-of-origin labelling regulation discriminated against Canada and Mexico.

The Canadian government has said one year after that regulation was imposed by Washington in 2008, shipments of Canadian cattle into the U.S. dropped by half and exports of slaughter hogs declined by 58 per cent.

Ritz called the new proposed rule "extremely" disappointing and said it would make the discrimination worse, hurting Canadian producers and the meat industry even more badly.

He said Ottawa will respond if the U.S. doesn't back off, but did not say how.

"Our government will consider all options, including retaliatory measures, should the U.S. not achieve compliance by May 23, 2013, as mandated by the WTO."

The Canadian Cattlemen's Association and the Canadian Pork Council issued statements Friday saying they share Ottawa's concerns.

The pork council estimates the U.S. government's current meat labelling rule has already cost Canada about $1 billion per year in reduced beef and cattle exports.

"The proposed rule is supposed to remove discrimination found by the WTO after a lengthy expensive challenge by Canada," the council said in a release.

"It does not do this, indeed, it exacerbates the problems."

The USDA said its country-of-origin rule is designed to help consumers make informed decisions about the food products they buy.

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Canada

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.