OTTAWA -- The Conservative government would not say whether it stands by its own accountability rules for members of cabinet after Finance Minister Jim Flaherty was accused of breaching the guidelines.
Carl Vallee, a spokesman for Stephen Harper, declined to say Thursday whether the Prime Minister's Office continues to endorse the rules on ministerial responsibility.
Opposition MPs roundly criticized the government for failing to live up to its own standards of acceptable behaviour.
The controversy was sparked by news that Flaherty had urged the federal broadcast regulator to grant a radio licence to a company in his Ontario riding, even though the rules -- posted on Harper's website -- forbid ministers to try influencing decisions of administrative tribunals.
In his letter to the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission, Flaherty praised Durham Radio Inc.'s ultimately unsuccessful bid to obtain a licence to operate a new FM station for the Toronto area.
The broadcaster, based in Flaherty's Whitby-Oshawa riding, was one of several applicants last year for the hotly contested spot on the FM dial. The company, which already has country and rock radio stations in Oshawa and Hamilton, was proposing an easy-listening outlet.
"Durham Radio has a strong track record for providing excellent service for their listeners, and this puts them in a solid position to offer this new service," Flaherty wrote in the letter, dated March 30, 2012. "As the MP for Whitby-Oshawa, I support their proposal and their application."
In a statement to The Canadian Press, which unearthed the letter, Flaherty said he would "continue to be a strong advocate for the people and community I represent. It is my job."
However, Flaherty's signature on the letter notes he is not just an MP, but also finance minister and minister for the Greater Toronto Area.
The CRTC, which administers broadcasting and telecommunications, is among the federal agencies known as quasi-judicial tribunals -- court-like bodies that make decisions at arm's length from the government.
Federal rules on ministerial responsibility, including interaction with such administrative bodies, are set out in Accountable Government: A Guide for Ministers and Ministers of State. The document was last updated in December 2010.
The rules say decisions made by administrative tribunals often concern individual rights or interests, are technical or are "considered sensitive and vulnerable to political interference (such as broadcasting)."
"Ministers must not intervene, or appear to intervene, with tribunals on any matter requiring a decision in their quasi-judicial capacity, except as permitted by statute."
The guide adds that although the minister or cabinet may have the authority to send back or overturn decisions once made, as is the case with the CRTC, "it is inappropriate to attempt to influence the outcome of a specific decision of a quasi-judicial nature."
In the guide's opening message, Harper says the rules will help his government maintain "a culture of accountability in everything we do, upholding the highest standards of probity and ethical conduct."
The ministerial responsibility rules complement the Conflict of Interest Act, the federal law that governs the ethical conduct of cabinet members.
In his statement, Flaherty said that as an MP, "my primary duty is to serve my constituents and represent the needs of my community, which I do on a daily basis on a variety of different issues."
"As highlighted in the letter to the CRTC, I was offering support to a local radio station from my riding as the member of Parliament."
The NDP said Flaherty showed a "lack of understanding of federal conflict-of-interest laws and guidelines."
New Democrat MP Andrew Cash said precedent suggests Flaherty should resign from cabinet. He stopped short of calling for the minister to quit, but demanded a "serious response" from the Conservatives.
"These are clear rules that the government has set out," Cash said, "and if they're not going to follow their own rules, then what kind of a government is this?"
Liberal MP Scott Andrews, the party's ethics critic, accused the Conservatives of hypocrisy.
"They make rules and then they break rules and say they don't apply to them and think they've done absolutely nothing wrong," he said Thursday.
"They've put a lot of words on paper, but they've never lived up to them."
In an email, Vallee defended Flaherty, saying he "wrote a letter on behalf of his constituents, as members of Parliament often do."
But Vallee would not answer questions about the status of the ministerial rules or whether the guide would be revised in light of the federal position on the finance minister's letter to the CRTC.
"We have no further comment," he said.
-- The Canadian Press