Canada

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Grievance over painting of nude Harper nixed

By: Linda Nguyen

Posted: 10/7/2012 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

Lars Hagberg / THE CANADIAN PRESS ARCHIVES Maggie Sutherland sits in front of her painting of a nude Prime Minister Stephen Harper. (CP)

TORONTO -- A complaint filed over a painting of Prime Minister Stephen Harper in the buff has been dismissed.

The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal has ruled it had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint lodged against the Kingston Frontenac Public Library for displaying the unauthorized nude depiction of Harper.

Curtis Stewart of St. Albert, Alta., had made the application last May, arguing his rights were infringed when the library chose to display the risqué painting as part of a local art show.

The tribunal notified Stewart of its decision on June 19, and gave him a month to respond.

He did not and the complaint is now considered abandoned.

The large oil-on-canvas painting drew controversy when it was unveiled last May.

Titled Emperor Haute Couture, it shows a smiling, unclothed Harper reclined on a chaise lounge with a dog by his feet and a woman in business attire offering him a Tim Hortons cup on a silver platter.

Margaret Sutherland, the Kingston, Ont.-based artist responsible for the piece, has said the painting is supposed to convey a message about her discontent over the government's decision to eliminate the long-form census and several prison farms.

"It was sort of a culmination of some general frustrations of the federal government's policies and what they were telling us," she told media at the time.

"The political message is to look for yourself and don't necessarily believe the party line."

The painting's title is also supposed to be a satirical take on the The Emperor's New Clothes, a children's story by Hans Christian Anderson about a vain king who wears no clothes because he believes his new suit is invisible to those unfit to see it.

It has since been sold to an unnamed private buyer for $5,000.

Phone calls to Stewart and Sutherland were unreturned Saturday.

The tribunal released its final decision Sept. 19.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 7, 2012 A6

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Canada

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.