Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Harper denies knowing about cheque to Duffy

Finally breaks silence about Senate-expenses controversy

  • Print

LIMA, Peru -- Prime Minister Stephen Harper insisted Thursday he did not know about -- nor was asked to sign off on -- the arrangement that saw his chief of staff cut a personal cheque for $90,000 to Sen. Mike Duffy.

Harper, currently on a trade mission in South America, took questions on the Senate scandal for the first time since news emerged about the controversial cheque written by his former right-hand man.

I did not know... (and) I was not consulted," Harper said, the Peruvian president standing at his side. "I was not asked to sign off on any such thing, and had I been consulted or known, I would not have agreed with it, and it is obviously for those reasons that I accepted Mr. Wright's resignation."

Harper said he learned about the arrangement through the media: "I immediately asked that that information be released publicly," he said.

He also said he's "sorry," "frustrated" and "extremely angry" about the mess, which has engulfed his government and threatens its carefully crafted image as a pillar of accountability and sound financial management.

'I did not know... (and) I was not consulted' -- Prime Minister Stephen Harper

The payment allowed Duffy to stop co-operating with an external audit of his expenses -- an audit that has since been referred back to the same Senate committee that has already reviewed its incomplete findings.

It deleted a specific reference to his failure to co-operate with auditors before releasing its report to the public.

The dropped paragraph details how the firm Deloitte was rebuffed when it asked Duffy again to provide additional documents, and for a meeting with his lawyer. Another section of the report, describing the language that defines a primary or secondary residence as "unambiguous," was also deleted -- but it remained in the reports tabled on two other senators, Mac Harb and Patrick Brazeau.

The federal ethics commissioner is probing the affair.

"Obviously I am very sorry that this has occurred. I am not only sorry, I've been through the range of emotions. I'm sorry, I'm frustrated, I'm extremely angry about it," Harper said.

"But that is the reality and I think we've dealt with it promptly."

Harper said when he learned Duffy had repaid the expenses, he assumed it had been from the senator's own pocket. "That's how it should have been," Harper said. "I know Mr. Wright assisted him, or did this for him, because he wanted to see the taxpayers reimbursed."

Wright resigned Sunday and Duffy quit the Tory caucus last week after details of the transaction emerged.

Duffy issued a public statement Wednesday in which he welcomed the re-examination of his expenses.

"Canadians deserve to know all of the facts," Duffy said. "I am confident that when they do they will conclude, as Deloitte has already concluded, that my actions regarding expenses do not merit criticism."

But the opposition suggested both Harper and Duffy remain complicit in a coverup, and urged the government to disclose all documents related to the transaction.

"Be clear, be forthright, stop hiding out in the Andes, get back up here, tell people what actually happened," said NDP Leader Tom Mulcair.

"There is something that doesn't wash in this whole story. Canadians understand that, they get that."

The Tories insist there is no paper trail, that no documents were drawn up to detail Wright's payment to Duffy.

In that case, produce a copy of the cancelled cheque, said Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau. "If we had the cheque we would know if the PM's right-hand man did indeed write it, who it was made out to, was it held in trust until Sen. Duffy lived up to his side of the bargain," Trudeau said.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 23, 2013 A4

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Jets This Week: Quarter Season Analysis

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A gaggle of Canada geese goslings at Woodsworth Park in Winnipeg Monday- See Project Honk Day 05- May 07, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • A young goose   reaches for long strands of grass Friday night near McGillvary Blvd-See Bryksa 30 Day goose challenge- Day 19 - May 23, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

How much does the premier's apology mean to you?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google