The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Ban upheld in child porn case after parents ask for daughter's name to be public

  • Print

HALIFAX - A provincial court judge in Halifax upheld a publication ban Friday on the identity of a teenaged girl in a prominent child pornography case after her parents asked that their daughter's name be made public.

Judge Jamie Campbell said the case is unusual, but he warned lifting the ban might set a precedent that leads to the identification of victims in other child pornography cases.

As a judge, he said he has to apply the law even if he doesn't personally agree with the consequences in a single case.

Campbell said a Criminal Code provision requiring judges to ban the identification of a person who appears in child pornography prevails over other statutes including the Youth Criminal Justice Act, which allows parents to waive publication bans if their child dies.

The girl in this case is deceased.

Two teens face charges of distributing child pornography in connection with the case, while one of them also faces a charge of making child pornography.

Campbell said it's clear Parliament didn't intend exceptions to apply to the Criminal Code ban on identification in child pornography cases, even if the case is being prosecuted under the Youth Criminal Justice Act.

"If we open the door here we don't know what's behind it," he said.

Campbell also said if he decided the Youth Criminal Justice Act prevailed over the ban in the Criminal Code, it could lead to irresponsible parents causing further harm to their children.

To make his point, Campbell used a hypothetical example of a 17-year-old father who makes pornographic images of his child and who falls under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. In that example, he said the father could — after the child and the child's mother dies — decide to allow the publication of the child's name to torment or blackmail the grandparents.

"Child pornography cases can plumb the depths of human depravity and even parents have been known to make pornographic images of their own children," he said.

Campbell noted that the Crown prosecution service can decide not to prosecute if the ban is broken.

The Crown made arguments in court in favour of lifting the ban, citing the parents' desire to have their daughter's name revealed and the attention the case has received.

A spokeswoman for the public prosecution service says the Crown will review a written version of the judge's decision before commenting.

Outside court, a lawyer for media outlets that applied to have the ban lifted said if the Crown decided it's not in the public interest to prosecute in this case, "that would be an elegant solution."

"It would serve the public interest not to prosecute," said Nancy Rubin.

She said the girl's parents or the media could still argue the ban in the Criminal Code violates charter rights guaranteeing freedom of expression, but that would have to be argued at a higher court.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Shots ring out as police say armed threat "resolved"

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • JOE.BRYKSA@FREEPRESS.MB.CA Local-(  Standup photo)-    A butterfly looks for nector on a lily Tuesday afternoon in Wolseley-JOE BRYKSA/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS- June 22, 2010
  • Marc Gallant / Winnipeg Free Press. Local- Weather standup. Sundog. Refraction of light through ice crystals which caused both the sun dog and and fog along McPhillips Road early Wednesday morning. 071205.

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

What should the city do with the 102-year-old Arlington Street bridge?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google