Canada

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Legal stage of murder conspiracy clarified

By: Staff Writer

Posted: 03/2/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0

OTTAWA -- The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeal of a young man convicted of conspiring to help two teenage girls drug and drown their alcoholic mother in a bathtub.

In doing so, the high court clarified the stage at which someone becomes part of a conspiracy.

A lower court convicted the man -- whose name is protected under the young offender law -- of conspiracy to commit murder for his role in the 2003 death of his girlfriend's mother.

The court heard he suggested the sisters -- who were 15 and 16 years old at the time -- ply their mother with alcohol and pills in the bathtub of their Mississauga, Ont., home.

Police uncovered a chat log between the young man and his girlfriend from a week before the murder.

"Your mom gets Tylenol 3's, right?" the man wrote.

"Probably," his girlfriend replied.

"Seriously, you should include them in the game plan," he wrote back.

"I'm not talking 20 here. I mean like five."

The dead mother was later found to have an amount of codeine in her blood consistent with the consumption of between four and six Tylenol 3 tablets.

The young man agreed to help the sisters come up with an alibi after the murder. He also suggested ways they could mislead police, suggesting they buy movie tickets for an hour before the killing took place to create a paper trail.

"I'm involved this much, I'm willing to help you out with any of it," he told his girlfriend in their chat.

He later told police his comments were not meant to be taken seriously.

The girls each received 10-year sentences, but have since been released.

The young man was found guilty of conspiracy to commit murder and received an 18-month sentence. Ontario's appeals court upheld the conspiracy conviction, but reduced the sentence to eight months confinement and four months under supervision.

The Supreme Court was essentially asked to determine the stage at which someone becomes part of a conspiracy, a legal question that had been answered differently from province to province.

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition March 2, 2013 A14

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.

More Canada

Undock

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.