Canada

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Luka Magnotta seeks to have public banned from preliminary hearing next week

By: Sidhartha Banerjee, The Canadian Press

Posted: 03/4/2013 10:21 AM | Last Modified: 03/4/2013 5:41 PM

Luka Rocco Magnotta is taken from a military plane to a waiting vehicle on June 18. (THE CANADIAN PRESS ARCHIVES)

MONTREAL - When Luka Magnotta returns before a judge for his preliminary hearing next week, he'll seek to have the public banned entirely from the courtroom.

A publication ban on evidence heard at a preliminary hearing is routine, but Magnotta's lawyer has taken the unusual step of asking that everyone be barred from the courtroom except the judge, the lawyers in the case and the court clerk.

The motion states that the request stems from an unspecified reason related to Magnotta's personal and medical history, details of which are not disclosed in the document.

The motion was filed in Quebec Court last Thursday by Luc Leclair, Magnotta's Toronto-based lawyer. It will be debated next Monday as Magnotta's preliminary inquiry is set to begin in Montreal.

The lengthy hearing will be used to determine whether Magnotta stands trial. Quebec Court judge Lori-Renee Weitzman will hear the case and, if it is sent to trial, the case will be heard by a different judge in Quebec Superior Court.

Magnotta is charged with first-degree murder in the slaying and dismemberment of Chinese-born student Jun Lin last May.

He is accused of mailing body parts to different places including the Ottawa offices of the Conservative Party of Canada, the Liberal Party of Canada and two Vancouver schools.

Magnotta became the target of an international manhunt after parts of Lin's body began turning up across the country.

Magnotta, 30, also faces other charges related to Lin's death: committing an indignity to a body; publishing obscene material; criminally harassing Prime Minister Stephen Harper and other members of Parliament; and mailing obscene and indecent material.

He has previously pleaded not guilty and chosen trial by judge and jury.

His court appearances have attracted throngs of journalists jostling for a spot in the high-security courtroom where he appeared. A 35-minute procedural hearing attracted nearly two dozen reporters, camerapeople and photographers.

A spokesman for the Crown prosecutor's office said Monday that there wouldn't be any comment until after the motion is debated.

Rene Verret said the Crown first wants a chance to hear the motion presented.

Magnotta's preliminary hearing is expected to last at least two weeks and several dates could also be added in June, if necessary.

One criminal attorney who is not connected to the Magnotta case said he has never heard of such a closed-door request before.

Steven Slimovitch said the publication ban is "almost automatic" at a preliminary stage, with details heard there kept from the public until charges are dropped or a criminal trial is complete.

But Slimovitch said he had never heard of the courtroom being cleared entirely.

The burden of proof will lie on Magnotta's legal team, he said.

"(The closed-door provision is) in the (Criminal) Code for a reason and presumably it is because it would affect the course of the inquiry," Slimovitch said.

"The idea is that to secure a fair trial for the accused, all members of the public must be excluded."

The provision in the Criminal Code notes that, under some circumstances, nobody except "the prosecutor, the accused and their counsel" might have access to the courtroom.

The written motion from Magnotta says that "the ends of justice will be best served by doing so."

Several media outlets are lining up to challenge the request.

"Asking for the removal of everyone from the courtroom, that's an exceptional measure and you have to have very exceptional grounds to be able to show that, without this, the accused would not get a fair trial," Slimovitch said.

Leclair did not immediately return a call Monday.

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required

In which story did you find the error? *
Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.
What was the error? *
Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.
What should we have written?
Please indicate your source for the correct information.
Who else should we interview to improve this story?
Please include any contact information you may have.
Can we contact you in the future for advice on stories about this topic?
Yes

No
First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Phone: *
This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.
Colour:
Are you blue? If you can see this, leave it blank and get some CSS support.
Enter the words that you see: * This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.
You have failed to correctly identify the words in the box above. Please try again.