Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Merits of moving oil by railway debated

Tragedy puts practice under microscope

  • Print

A whopping 28,000 per cent increase in the amount of oil shipped by rail over the past five years is coming under the microscope following the deadly rail blast in Quebec.

Canada's railways have made a determined push to cash in on the country's crude-oil bonanza, painting themselves as a cost-effective alternative to politically unpopular pipelines such as the proposed Keystone XL.

The Canadian Railway Association recently estimated as many as 140,000 carloads of crude oil are expected to rattle over the nation's tracks this year, up from only 500 carloads in 2009.

The eye-popping increase has gone largely unnoticed because public attention has been focused on the pipeline debates, said NDP energy critic Peter Julian.

Driven by the development of unconventional energy sources, the railway group expects a similar increase in traffic in the coming years, noting as many as 600 barrels can be moved per carload.

"Railways have become a complementary option for moving crude to refineries located near tidewater for access by ocean tankers (that) are not currently served by pipeline," the railway association's president, Michael Bourque, wrote in as recent online message, posted prior to the weekend tragedy.

He singled out the Irving refinery in New Brunswick as one example.

Now Irving Oil has confirmed in a statement the fateful shipment of crude, which exploded Saturday, was bound for its New Brunswick refinery.

A rash of accidents and spills over the last year, in both Canada and the U.S., prompted Bourque to take aim at critics, who questioned safety, saying their remarks "are simply not true" and railways deliver dangerous goods "99.9977 per cent" of the time without incident.

The Quebec disaster is the fourth freight-train accident under investigation involving crude-oil shipments since the beginning of the year, according to the federal Transportation Safety Board.

There have been a number of high-profile accidents recently, including one late last month on a sagging bridge in flood-ravaged Calgary. The derailed cars were able to be removed without spilling their cargo.

A month earlier, 91,000 litres of oil spilled from a CP Rail car near Jansen, Sask.

Jean-Paul Lacoursi®re, a chemical-engineering professor at Quebec's University of Sherbrooke, said there are more variables to consider when using rail instead of pipelines.

"The state of the track, how well the equipment is maintained, mechanical errors -- all these things need to be considered," said Lacoursi®re, an expert in the shipment of dangerous substances. "It doesn't mean we can use an old pipeline without assessment of the risks. But if you have a good pipeline, there's less risk."

Julian said the Harper government has largely abandoned railway inspection, imposing as much as $3 million in cuts, and allowed the industry to monitor itself.

It's not good enough for the association to claim only a tiny fraction of the dangerous goods ever go off the rails, he added.

"When you talk to residents of places like Lac-Mégantic, they would not accept anything less than the highest possible safety standards," Julian said.

 

-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 8, 2013 0

History

Updated on Monday, July 8, 2013 at 8:04 AM CDT: corrects errors in words with "é"

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Winnipeg Cheapskate: Cheap summer weekends

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A group of Horese pose for the camera in the early evening light at Southcreek Stables in Stl Norbert Wednessday. Sept  14, 2011 (RUTH BONNEVILLE) / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • A Canada goose makes takes flight on Wilkes Ave Friday afternoon- See Bryksa’s 30 Day goose a day challenge- Day 09- May 11, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should the city grant mosquito buffer zones for medical reasons only?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google