The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

More legal challenges filed in Federal Appeal Court against Northern Gateway nod

  • Print
The view looking down the Douglas Channel from Kitimat, B.C. Tuesday, June, 17, 2014. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward

Enlarge Image

The view looking down the Douglas Channel from Kitimat, B.C. Tuesday, June, 17, 2014. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward

VANCOUVER - The Gitga'at First Nation will ask the Federal Court of Appeal to recognize the band's aboriginal title along the proposed tanker route where ships would be carrying oil from the Northern Gateway pipeline as part of a legal fight against the proposal.

The band filed an application with the court on Monday, bringing to at least five the number of groups seeking judicial review of the federal cabinet's decision approving the project.

"The Gitga'at put forward evidence of title to specific areas in the Douglas Channel," said their lawyer, Michael Lee Ross.

Last month, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized the Tsilhqot'in nations' aboriginal title to more than 1,700 square kilometres of land in the B.C. Interior. Theirs was the first such recognition in the country.

Ross said the Gitga'at's participation in the joint review process provided a legal basis for declaring the North Coast community's title over their traditional marine territory.

Such a declaration would mean the band would have to approve of the project, or the federal government would have to prove it was in the national interest, he said.

The pipeline and tankers present little or no economic benefit to the community and do not meet the criteria set out by the high court for infringing on their territory, Ross argued.

He said they do present significant threats to Hartley Bay, the village best known for rescuing passengers from the sunken Queen of the North ferry.

"Gitga'at did try to engage with the federal government in a more serious way about some of these things and they really didn't get anywhere," Lee said.

"It's not like they just immediately said, 'well, we're going to go after title.'"

Two other legal challenges were also filed on Monday, the 15-day deadline set out in new rules brought in by the Conservative government.

The Heiltsuk and the Kitasoo-Xaixais added their names to a list of groups that want the Federal Court of Appeal to review the cabinet decision.

Those First Nations, whose territory on the central coast is also along the tanker path of the project, say they will fight the pipeline in court "and, if necessary, on the land."

"Our people have been clear since this pipeline was proposed," said Heiltsuk Chief Councillor Marilyn Slett.

"We will not allow this to threaten our waters. We stand with our relatives up and down the coast in rejecting this frightful project."

The environmental group B.C. Nature also filed an application with the court, bringing to at least five the number of legal challenges filed in the past few days.

All claim the federal cabinet's decision last month is invalid because it's based on a flawed report from a joint review panel.

B.C. Nature's lawyer, Chris Tollefson of the Environmental Law Centre at the University of Victoria, said cabinet was also legally required to give its reasons for approving the pipeline, which it did not.

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. A previous version said there was a 30-day deadline for filing appeal applications with the court.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Wasylycia-Leis tops in most issues important to Winnipeggers

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • PHIL.HOSSACK@FREEPRESS.MB.CA 101130-Winnipeg Free Press Columns of light reach skyward to the stars above Sanford Mb Tuesday night. The effect is produced by streetlights refracting through ice crystals suspended in the air on humid winter nights. Stand Up.....
  • A squirrel enjoys the morning sunshine next to the duck pond in Assiniboine Park Wednesday– June 27, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Should panhandling at intersections be banned?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google