Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 21/5/2013 (1336 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
OTTAWA -- A "very upset" Prime Minister Stephen Harper tried to settle down a scandal-rattled Conservative caucus Tuesday with talk of accountability and Senate reform, but shed no new light on the $90,000 transaction that cost him his chief of staff.
Conservative MPs and senators heading into Tuesday's caucus meeting had hoped Harper would provide more facts behind the growing scandal that forced his right-hand man, Nigel Wright, to resign over the weekend.
But if Harper's speech -- opened up on this occasion to the media, a rarity -- was any indication, they didn't get much.
"I don't think any of you are going to be very surprised to hear that I am not happy," Harper said in his first public comments since revelations last week that Wright wrote a personal cheque worth $90,000 to embattled Sen. Mike Duffy.
"I'm very upset about the conduct we have witnessed, the conduct of some parliamentarians and the conduct of my own office."
Harper didn't go into detail, however, about just how involved he or his office was in helping Duffy repay living expenses he shouldn't have claimed.
Nor did he go any farther behind closed doors.Sources told The Canadian Press that while MPs pressed for more details during the meeting on his office's role in bailing out Duffy, they didn't get any.
The matter is in the hands of the federal ethics commissioner, who can be trusted to sort things out, many suggested.
'I'm very upset about the conduct we have witnessed, the conduct of some parliamentarians and the conduct of my own office' -- Prime Minister Stephen Harper
"Trust me, they ask all the questions and they get to the bottom of the matters, and that is the appropriate place, and that's where the ethics commissioner's report comes up," Labour Minister Lisa Raitt said. "It will be transparent and we will be accountable."
Ethics commissioner Mary Dawson confirmed she had "today launched an examination under the Conflict of Interest Act of Mr. Nigel Wright's involvement in the repayment of a senator's expenses."
The commissioner had no further comment on whether Wright broke ethics rules by giving Duffy what was initially described as a gift to help pay back his disallowed housing expenses. Duffy used the payment as an excuse to stop co-operating with an ongoing audit of his expenses.
The issue of Duffy's expense claims is to be reviewed anew by the Senate internal economy committee, which Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird referred to Tuesday as an "independent" body.
"We look forward to the results of these reviews," Baird said.
The Prime Minister's Office said last week Wright was not expecting Duffy to repay him, but suggested there was an agreement between the two men.
"The only stipulation on the money to Duffy -- sent to him through his lawyer -- was that an equal amount be sent to the Receiver General from Duffy on the same day to cover the impugned claims," Harper spokesman Andrew MacDougall said in an email.
CTV reported Monday a formal agreement was written up governing the terms of the payment, but Baird repeatedly fended off a barrage of questions Tuesday in the Commons, saying there was no written deal. "Our understanding is that there is no such agreement."
Benjamin Perrin, the lawyer reportedly used by the Prime Minister's Office to draft the arrangement, also issued a denial.
"I was not consulted on, and did not participate in, Nigel Wright's decision to write a personal cheque to reimburse Sen. Duffy's expenses," Perrin said in a statement. "I have never communicated with the prime minister on this matter."
Meanwhile, questions linger on whether the transaction between Duffy and Wright came with a commitment that the Senate committee investigating Duffy's claims would go easy on him.
That matter was to be raised in the Senate when it resumed sitting Tuesday evening.
Senators were to consider the report on Duffy, and on Sen. Patrick Brazeau and Sen. Mac Harb, all of them deemed to owe taxpayers thousands of dollars in improperly claimed living expenses.
A fourth report, containing recommendations for changes to the rules, is also up for discussion.
Harper said he has discussed the situation with Sen. Marjory LeBreton, the government leader in the Senate.
"She has my full support to accelerate changes to the Senate's rules on expenses and close any loopholes in those existing rules," Harper said. "And I expect Conservative senators, regardless of what opposition you may face, to get that done."
A fifth report looking into expenses claimed by Sen. Pamela Wallin remains outstanding. She and Duffy have already left caucus. Brazeau was removed earlier because of criminal charges on an unrelated matter.
Harper reminded his caucus about a pointed warning he first issued in 2005: No one seeking elected office to line their own pockets is welcome in the Conservative fold.
"Anyone who wants to use public office for their own benefit should make other plans, or better yet, leave this room," Harper said, jabbing his finger for effect.
Some observers have painted the crisis as the most serious test the Conservatives have faced since winning their majority in 2011, but Harper framed the issue more as a minor distraction.
"We have an active and important agenda on the issues that matter to hardworking Canadian families and there is much work to be done," he said.
"When distractions arise, as they inevitably will, we will deal with them firmly."
Harper's speech was greeted with an ovation and his caucus broke out into chants at the end, drowning out reporters who tried to ask the prime minister questions.
Harper needs to be a lot clearer with Canadians, the opposition said, using up a third of Tuesday's question period to grill the government.
"They think we're fools," said Francoise Boivin of the NDP. "They're trying to make us believe that (Harper) knew nothing."
The government "has lost its moral compass," boomed Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau. "The prime minister is in this up to his neck."
Through it all, Baird maintained an uncharacteristic calm, insisting Harper only knew of the payment to Duffy when it became public last week.
-- The Canadian Press