A few clouds

Winnipeg, MB

9°c A few clouds

Full Forecast

Canada

The Canadian Press - ONLINE EDITION

Public search in Calgary murder case ends following request from police

Posted: 07/17/2014 2:00 PM | Comments: 0

Last Modified: 07/17/2014 5:11 PM

Advertisement

  • Print

AIRDRIE, Alta. - Organizers are calling off their civilian search for signs of a missing five-year-old boy and his grandparents after police said they no longer need the help.

Matt Forseth had said the search would continue, despite a social media backlash, until investigators asked them to stop.

Calgary police issued a news release Thursday afternoon that thanked the searchers for their efforts, but said that public assistance searching public property was not needed.

Forseth said his group will respect the wishes of police.

"We will cease our search," Forseth said.

The volunteers had been scouring rural areas near the community of Airdrie for any sign of Alvin and Kathy Liknes and their grandson, Nathan O'Brien, who disappeared in late June.

Douglas Garland, who lived on an acreage near Airdrie, has been charged with three counts of murder, even though the bodies have not been found.

Police said in their news release that they have a 30-day search plan that's "intelligence driven." They said the plan "cannot be shared outside of law enforcement in order to protect the integrity of the investigation."

They said the places they are searching have a "high likelihood of locating evidence."

Police are still asking landowners and businesses to check their properties for anything suspicious.

"At this time we do not require assistance from the public in relation to searching public property, however we appreciate the outpouring of community support," the release stated.

Forseth said the volunteers hadn't been searching areas where police were focused. He said they were staying off private property unless they were specifically invited by landowners.

While the police news release didn't specifically ask the volunteers to stop, he said it seemed to suggest it.

"It leans towards them having their plan in place and they don't need the public," he said.

The group had called off the search Wednesday following negative social media comments.

Forseth said the angry backlash came when a news report was posted on the group's Facebook page that said police were upset with the volunteer search.

"People were calling us media hounds, selfish, that we were looking to post selfies on Facebook," Forseth said. "It became so overwhelming."

Forseth said organizers resumed it Thursday morning after more than 100 people showed up and pledged to keep looking anyway.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.