November 28, 2015


-9° C, Clear

Full Forecast


Senate-scandal attacks blunted

OTTAWA -- Opposition politicians have been hammering away at the Senate-expenses scandal during question period, but the government is getting in some jabs of its own.

With Prime Minister Stephen Harper skipping the Monday session, as is his practice, it fell to Heritage Minister James Moore to deflect a barrage of Senate questions.

But recent missteps for both NDP Leader Tom Mulcair and Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau made it easy for the government benches to blunt their attacks.

Mulcair wanted to know when Harper would provide answers about the scandal -- specifically the $90,000 cheque written by the prime minister's former chief of staff to cover Sen. Mike Duffy's questionable expense claims.

"When will the prime minister take responsibility, show accountability and finally start answering questions?" Mulcair thundered.

Moore countered by bringing up NDP MP Tyrone Benskin, who Mulcair fired from his critic's job last week after he admitted he owed almost $60,000 in back taxes.

Moore wondered aloud how many more of Mulcair's MPs are behind in their taxes.

"If he really believes in accountability, maybe he would tell this House how many more NDP MPs are not paying their taxes."

Trudeau got up to promote Liberal efforts to move a motion before the Senate ethics committee to study the Senate scandal and call both Harper and Nigel Wright, his former chief of staff, to testify.

Instead, he got a pointed reminder of his comments about Senate reform, published Friday in Montreal's Le Soleil, that landed him in hot water. Trudeau was expressing his opposition to abolishing the Senate when he pointed out it gives Quebec an advantage -- more seats than Alberta and British Columbia.

"It is kind of interesting to see him stand in the House and pretend as though he actually cares about Senate reform because he does not," Moore said.

"All Canadians should be served by national institutions and the Liberal leader should stop dividing Canadians again and again over these matters."

Outside the House, Trudeau stood by his remarks as "a statement of fact, not of opinion."

"My comments were... reflecting the numerical reality of the Senate and the challenges around reforming it," he said.

"We have a morass to get into to make any changes to the Senate and both other political parties in the House are using discussions about the Senate to distract from what should be the most important issue of the day, which is their ethical shortcomings."


-- The Canadian Press

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 28, 2013 A10

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Scroll down to load more